THE TRUMP DOCTRINE!

Quite unlike that of our gutless quasi-muslim in chief or
that Gollum-like freemartin who wants to take his place.

THE TRUMP DOCTRINE!


It’s time to shake the rust off America’s foreign policy. It’s time to invite new voices and new visions into the fold, something we have to do. The direction I will outline today will also return us to a timeless principle. My foreign policy will always put the interests of the American people and American security above all else. It has to be first. Has to be.

That will be the foundation of every single decision that I will make. America first will be the major and overriding theme of my administration. But to chart our path forward, we must first briefly take a look back. We have a lot to be proud of.

In the 1940s we saved the world. The greatest generation beat back the Nazis and Japanese imperialists. Then we saved the world again. This time, from totalitarianism and communism. The Cold War lasted for decades but, guess what, we won and we won big. Democrats and Republicans working together got Mr. Gorbachev to heed the words of President Reagan, our great president, when he said, tear down this wall.

History will not forget what he did. A very special man and president.

Unfortunately, after the Cold War our foreign policy veered badly off course. We failed to develop a new vision for a new time. In fact, as time went on, our foreign policy began to make less and less sense. Logic was replaced with foolishness and arrogance, which led to one foreign policy disaster after another.

The complete speech here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means yer already on it!

Michael Bloomberg: Self Righteous Carpet Bagging Asshole

As for me, I like Coke ... AND guns.

Last Tuesday, self righteous carpet bagging asshole and would be savior of your soul and mine, Michael Bloomberg, lost out in Virginia. In his quest to rid the world of guns, and tell everyone else how to live in general, he sunk some dough in last Tuesdays' elections in Virginia.

The useless ghoul tried to make political hay out of last summers' fatal shooting of two Virginia TV reporters by dumping some dough into two state senate races.

Things didn't go well as the morbid jerk would have liked. News link here.

In other news a Bloomberg wannabe posing as a school principal, protects the kiddies from the evils of imaginary bows and arrows here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Marijuana Legalization In Ohio: The Good News and the Bad News

Robert Mitchum would have been more appropriate.

Marijuana Legalization In Ohio: The Good News and the Bad News


The good news is ...

Marijuana is STILL illegal in Ohio.

The bad news is ...

Marijuana is STILL illegal in Ohio.

Look ... I'm all for the DECRIMINALISING of weed. The laws are stupid. There are too many people in jail who shouldn't be. The present situation hardly protects anyone. And it short circuits natural selection.

But Legalize!?

Issue 3, if it had become part of the Ohio constitution, was a bad deal.

It would have made for even more stupid law. Folks in jail would have still had to fill out sentences. It would have increased the size, reach and expense of government. And it would have granted, TO A SELECT FEW, the green light to operate "plantations" for the growing of weed thus creating a tax funded, government approved monopoly.

Someone was going to come out ahead but it wasn't going to be the taxpayer and/or necessarily the smoker.

It was a bad deal all around.

Link from My Way News here.

I'm Voting NO! On Ohios' Issue 3: On Solid Libertarian Grounds here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. High or not, if there's articles under this 'un, yer already there.

I'm Voting NO! On Ohios' Issue 3 ... On Solid Libertarian Grounds

This piece is off the top 'o my head so if it comes across as a bit disjointed please take that into consideration.


I'm Voting NO! On Ohios' Issue 3 ... On Solid Libertarian Grounds


One would think that if one is libertarian (Note the SMALL "L"!) one would be all for voting yes on Ohios' Issue 3, Marijuana Reform. I for one will not ... And here's why.

The Delaware Gazette, in its' 10-15-15 issue published an article (With an insert of the official proposed amendment literature from the Ohio Secretary of State office.) on the pros and cons:

Pro:

1. Personal choice - Allowing one 21 or older to possess up to 9 ounces of weed.

So what? It still sets limits on how much one can posses.

2. Compassionate care - Authorizes non-profit dispensaries for medical marijuana.

Who pays for those "non-profit dispensaries"?

3. Tax Revenue - Is expected to generate more than 550 million in revenue.

I guess that's what's gonna pay for the above dispensaries ... maybe. What if it doesn't? What if it's not enough?  And even what if it does? Is all that money going to be for the above or wasted on other government programs?

4. Regulated Industry - An independent commission will oversee the growth and sale of weed.

REGULATE! REGULATE! REGULATE!

TAX! TAX! TAX!

GOVERNMENT!

GOVERNMENT!

GOVERNMENT!

Independent commission? If it's government, it's NOT independent!

By the way, the official Proposed Constitutional Amendment literature uses the words "tightly regulated industry" in regard to this commissions' duties.

Con:

1. Creates Monopoly - Ten facilities will have EXCLUSIVE rights to grow weed. Interestingly enough, the official Ohio secretary of state summary document DOES use the word, monopoly!

ONLY ten "facilities". Isn't that nice. Sounds like a GOVERNMENT monopoly alright.

2. Tax rate - A preferential tax rate is set into the Ohio Constitution that can't be changed by legislation like rates on beer, wine and tobacco.

Ah taxes again. I really don't care about the above except that it allows GOVERNMENT (!) to tax it, period.

3. Risk to children - Outlets will be allowed to sell weed-laced products like candy and cookies.

I seriously doubt such products will be allowed by law to be sold to kids. Same limits as in smokes, alky and drugs.

Of course, as we all know, it's best everyone be banned from owning anything (Drugs, weed, guns, books, vid games, internet, media, porn, candy, cookies, fun, anything hot or sharp, etc.). It's for the children after all. If banning everything will save the fictional life of a hypothetical child not related to you then a police state is entirely justified.

Yes, SOME children actually do suffer and die from the actions of evil people. I run the same risk while alive just like everyone else. Howsomever, my and everyone elses' constitutional and God given rights trump statist dreams. Sad to say ... Shit happens.

Callous you say? Nowhere near as callous as some media whore (Or someone trying to score talking points.) exploiting survivors and dancing on the bodies in the name of ratings and market share ...

4. Quantity - See #1 in the above Pro section.

5. Stores - Allows for 1159 retail outlets.

Will there really be THAT many? Who cares? Oh yes! GOVERNMENT does.

6. Will flood Ohio with marijuana.

I gotz news fer ya' pal. OHIO IS ALREADY FLOODED WITH MARIJOHOONIE! It's Ohios' biggest cash crop fer cryin' out loud!

Look ... I'm all for DECRIMINALIZING weed. I'm all for repealing those stupid laws short circuiting natural selection and putting people in jail who shouldn't be there in the first place. I'm all for letting folks commit suicide with their method of choice.

But ... legalize it?

No.

From looking at Mr. Husteds' (Ohio Secretary of State) document, Issue 3 is nothing more than an attempt at a government power grab. Instead of people being left the hell alone, Issue 3 opens the floodgates to more government expansion, more and higher taxes, more curtailment of freedom and a general tightening of the governmental choke hold on everything we already have.

VOTE NO ON ISSUE THREE!

And please don't talk to me about marijuana reform being about "freedom". You're not a libertarian ... You're just a pothead!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there're a buncha articles unner' this 'un, stoned or not, yer already there.

Oh Great! ... An Endorsement ...

Oh Great! ... An Endorsement ...

I go to one of my favorite Libertarian sites, hoping to get a bit of insight into the goings on in the world from someone with more or less my point of view. And what do I see? ...

THIS!

Terrific!

Now this means I'm gonna' have to post more articles. Some even to be "written" by me. That's work!

I was really enjoying my being lax about my blog. Now I'm gonna' have to post AT LEAST once a week.

Thanks a LOT Mr. Traven!

Next week I'll be posting an article on why I'm voting AGAINST Ohios' Issue 3 (Marijuana Reform) and on SOLID Libertarian grounds.

AS for those capitalists/socialists masquerading as Libertarians ... TOO BAD FOR YOU!


Link to the above heads-up here.

Link to that despicable blog with the heads-up here.


Go to Jays Tee Vee blog main page here. If you see any articles under this 'un, with or without the heretofore mentioned Karol Traven, yer already there.

Bernie Sanders 2016 ... An Economic Revolution is Coming! ... Hallelujah!

Bernie Sanders 2016 ... An Economic Revolution is Coming! ... Hallelujah!


Could it be Mr. Sanders has discovered an inexhaustible power scource? After all, in the words of V I Lenin: "Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country."

Remember kiddies, Socialism/Communism/Liberalism/democrats is NOT about something for nothing.

It's about something from your wallet.

From each according to his ability ... filtered through a fat bureaucracy ... to each according to his disability.

They want theirs and everybodys' cake ... And eat yours too.

Not to worry. It's all in the best of intentions and with your safety and welfare at heart.

I mean ... just because it's never worked before doesn't mean it won't work this time.

C'MON! GIVE IT A CHANCE!

... again ...

No ... really!

Maybe ...

... not.


Go to the blog I got the above "poster" from here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any other articles under this 'un, with or without ol' Bernie means you're already there.

Liberty, Rule of Law and the Hateful Heretic

Link to article accompanying above illustration here.

Ex-Army blog main page here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Bake My Cake You Damn Breeders! ... Or Else ...

Pretty much what the Supreme Court has put us into.

Bake My Cake You Damn Breeders! ... Or Else ...


135,000 dollar "legal" blackmail penalty for not baking a cake. Coming to a bakery or any other small business near you.

Further details here.

Godfather Politics main page here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Charleston, Obama, Clinton and the Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media

Charleston, Obama, Clinton and the Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Earlier this week, a pathetic, evil individual shot and killed nine people in a church in Charleston, South Carolina.

Within hours of the shooting, while CNN and other "news" outlets went into their usual frenzy of anti firearms indignation and phony concern, President Barack Obama and Presidential candidate Hilary Clinton stepped up to the mike offering their condolences AND  exploiting the situation for their agendas and garnering votes.

The following is a reposting of an article posted by an annonymous writer on the 4chan website stating what one may expect from politicians, "social reformers", so-called mainstream media and other would-be saviors of your soul in the next few weeks:


Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Got this while perusing the 4chan website some time after the Newtown/Sandy Hook incident. As it makes more than enough sense, I'm posting it here:

I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

Remember folks, in spite of what CNN et al thinks, you have minds of your own. Use them.

Be sure to check out the pro-gun organisation links in the I Second the Motion section on the right side of this page.

Guns, Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.

4chan website here. Warning: CONTAINS CONTENT INAPPROPRIATE FOR CHILDREN.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

A Couple of Quibcags ...

A Couple of Quibcags ...


So just what exactly is a "quibcag"? Simply put: Quote Illustrated by Cute Anime Girl.

These can be found at Karol Travens' Ex-Army blog.

I fell across this blog while searching for illustrations for my Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya fanfic story, Mr. John Smith Goes To Washington. I pirated about three of them as I thought they were appropriate.

The blog itself is a Libertarian website with a racist tone to it, so if you find that objectionable, I'd advise not going there. If you can get past that, you'll find the site to be witty, insightful (And INCITEFUL!) and bitingly blunt about any subject mentioned as well as critical of the "idealistic" (And UNREALISTIC!) "unicorns and rainbows" version of Libertarianism that has been bandied about for years. You know, if everyone in the world knew about the Libertarian world view, they'd all embrace it and become good little free enterprisers. Even the folks at ISIS/ISIL/ASSHOLE would drop their Islamic silliness and go for the gusto!

Not gonna' happen.

A feature of Mr. Travens' blog is the above mentioned "quibcag", of which a couple (Somewhat related to one another.) I have illustrated below:

Mr. Traven will also quote other writers for his 'cags'.

Maybe, maybe not. If one is not careful, you
could find yourself porn surfing for the rest
of your life.

A bit of irony here. In my aforementioned fanfic wherein I used some of Mr. Travens 'cags', the three white guys in the story "hook up" with the three Asian babes of the Haruhi series ... And we all know what an aggressive little sexpot Yuki Nagato can be!

Yeah ... Right!

Hentai is NOT canon.

Just sayin' ...

Mr. Travens' Ex-Army blog here.

Mr. John Smith Goes to Washington here.

C V Fords' profile page and fanfiction story list here.

Fanfiction dot net here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there's a buncha' articles under this 'un, yer already there ... uh ... Here!

Ten Reasons For Gun Control

Credit: Matt Bailey

Ten Reasons For Gun Control


They make perfectly good sense to me.


Ex-Army here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

A Short Conversation With Evil

Pretty much describes liberals and liberalism.
Conservatives and conservatism not much better either.

A Short Conversation With Evil


I had a little talk with evil the other day. A person of my "aquaintance" and I had a chance discussion about various topics when the subject of internet freedom came up.

I mentioned the U.S. government/ICANN was going to hand over its' "control" of the internet to a United Nations governing body. You know the ... U.N. . That playpen of dictators, do-gooders and terrrorists operating on our dime.

As much as I DESPISE "our" government, I will say that it has pretty much had a hands off attitude in regard to free expression on the net. I mentioned this to her and stated the possibility of American websites being closed down if some foriegn "faction" or other gets its' nose out of joint because they don't like what's being said about them.

Her reply:

"Just watch what you say on the net."

I responded by saying the net is the last "frontier" of free expression  and the only thing one should fear on the net is someone demanding that one back up their statements with facts and ideas.

She concluded the discussion with her usual irrefutable, fact and idea filled, "winning" statement of arguments past:

"I don't wanna' hear it!"

This is what they say when they don't have the physical means to shut you up. Or at least when there isn't enough of them around to shout you down.

I absolutely HATE ... detest ... liberals and liberalism (Almost as much as conservatives and conservatism!). Not because they are and is but because they aren't and isn't.. How can one call oneself liberal and advocate taking away rights? They are the fascists they accuse everyone else of being. Hypocrisy becomes them.

Much to their delight, the greatest, most prosperous country ever is sinking to its' knees and into a socialist dark age. In their masochistic, self hating 'gasm' they drag us with them.

Due to their efforts, their "leaders" have delayed the consequences of their recent voting/actions thus postponing the effects of Obamacare until after the 2016 elections. Obamacare will eventually bring home the consequences of appealing to the something for nothing crowd as never before in the history of this country, and it is my fervent hope they feel it in FULL weight and measure.

They deserve what we're all gonna' get.

It will be interesting to see how they cope on part time pay due to the employer mandate keeping them from having a full time job with a single employer ... with a whopping MANDATORY monthly health insurance payment on top of it. The choice of meeting the monthly rent/mortgage OR the health insurance payment oughta' be fun.

Think about it. There are now laws on the books that will eventually prevent many from having a full time job in a single place of employment due to the employer mandate.

As for myself, if it comes to my having to do the monetary equivalent of making monthly payments on a new luxury car the rest of my life, then I'll just do without the health insurance and pay the yearly fine ... At least until the fine is more expensive than the insurance. I'd sooner pay the rent than be out on the street.

The age of low cost liberalism may be about over and the yelping from liberals, politicians and parasites may be a delight to hear. Maybe then it will hit home on enough of them to stop what they're doing and think a bit.

And no ... I'm not into "tough love" ... I'm into sadism. And these masochists will have no right to complain.

Ah! ... Schadenfreude ...

Just sayin' ...

It would be more accurate to have the liberal "wedgie" in the "Communitarian"
corner. After all, a liberal is nothing more than a communist without the courage
to kill for his beliefs.

PC World article on ICANN and internet freedom at risk here.

The Capitalism/Socialism Non-Difference here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there's a buncha' articles under this one, you're already there.

The afore-promised "anti"-Walking Dead article to appear sometime next week.

A New Yorkers' View of Gun Control

A New Yorkers' View of Gun Control

An article from Trib Live

By Tom Purcell 

Published: Saturday, August 31, 2013, 9:00 p.m.Updated: Sunday, September 1, 2013 

During my last visit to New York City, I stumbled into an unexpected discussion about its restrictive gun polices.

The discussion occurred after I ducked into a coffee shop. The place was empty except for three transit employees.

“I don't know why the kid shot me,” said one of the men. “But I got myself some protection now.”

Curious, I introduced myself and asked the fellow about his story.

The rest of the story here.

Gabrielle Giffords: Professional Martyr, Predatory Victim here.

Gun Control: It's Not the Children, It's the AGENDA here.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media here.

Obama Gun Control Poster here.

A Distinction (Or) a Rantly Screed here.

Guns, Polls and Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

Well Isn't THAT Special! Barack and the Kiddies here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.

Aardvarks' Plumbline blog here.

Trib Live home page here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

A "Word" From the National Guard

A "Word" From the National Guard


The following is a FICTITIOUS "script" for a National Guard public service ad. This is not to malign the National Guard but to be taken in the CAUTIONARY SPIRIT for which it is intended.


Man: I remember the moment clearly.

Woman: I'll never forget that moment.

M: As long as I live.

W: It changed my life.

M: I'd been training with my team for months ... And now had been called up for the first time. At that moment it hit me. This is why I joined the Guard. The real deal.

W: We're soldiers. Always ready to protect our GOVERNMENT. And we have communities ... Family, friends, neighbors who must be closely watched.

M: Free thinking was getting dangerously close to dissent. At that moment, I felt just how important the Guard is to my GOVERNMENT.

W: And I was going to make a difference, right here in my community.

M: Together with local enforcers, we incarcerated dissidents & confiscated weapons & literature. We had to get the people & the situation under control.

W: As a citizen enforcer, I made a difference.

Announcer: Be there ... For your GOVERNMENT. See how the Guard can be an important part of your life & what it means to be a citizen enforcer at ----nationalguard.com.


Copyright © (Article only.) 7-2-13 Jay Agan  Feel free to copy & post citing proper credit.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

The Capitalism/Socialism Non-Difference

Not meaning to detract from the seriousness of the following
article, but this is the only "socialist" I can stand to be around.

The Capitalism/Socialism Non-Difference

by

Jay Agan


For many years we have been fooled. Fooled with a lie still being used to manipulate us into being good little servers of the system. That lie is the so-called difference between capitalism & socialism.

Difference? I sure don't see it. I do see, not only similarity, but compatability. Several in fact. They are:

1. Both capitalism and socialism view the universe & explain everything in terms of economics and materialism. "Intangibles" such as family, friends, race, ethnic identity, nation, individuality, spirituality have no meaning unless they can be exploited somehow for economic gain or power.

2. Both deal with the individual as part of an artificial collective. With socialism it's "the brotherhood of man ", the community, society, "for the children" , whatever the "cause" they're for or whatever they're calling the hive mind this week.  With capitalism it's the corporation, the team, the board, the company, etc. Such terms are used by those for scoring talking points, pushing agendas & controlling individuals.

Collectives aren't living, breathing entities. They have no mind of their own & do not act volitionally.

3. Both put the rights of the artificial collective above that of the individual.

4. Both look upon the individual as part of a rescource pool. Something to be used then tossed away. The term "human rescources" is something of an indictment.

5. Both use the individual as a statistic, an economic unit. An entry in a ledger to be added, subtracted, multiplied, divided, fractionalized, decimalized, atomized, then ultimately isolated & tossed away.

6. To either, a living, breathing human being is only an object, a thing. Having no value except to that of the artificial collective. To be used in a manner suitable to furthering that collective. To be discarded when no longer useful.

I do make a distinction between capitalism & free enterprise. Free enterprise involves the TRADITIONAL employer/employee relationship. This is where the employee trades his time, skill, experience etc. for whatever pay/benefits agreed upon. The employer can only demand a good job done & NOTHING MORE.

In the traditional employer/employee relationship neither demands anything beyond that. If the employer does go over that line it's capitalism. If the employee, it's socialism.

Capitalism? Socialism? I care for neither. From my perspective I have found capitalism to be more of a menace to me than socialism. I have lived in a capitalist country all my life and have have been treated shabbily by such a system. I do not doubt for one moment that socialism is no less a danger. It's that I have been on the sharp end of a capitalist system and draw my experience from that. After all, no socialist has ever:

1. Lied to me about my wages then shorted me.

2. Layed me off then say I was fired or quit when I tried to collect unemployment benefits.

3. Tried to monopolize my time. (Mandatory overtime, etc.)

4. Spied on me at work, written me up for political incorrectness, thus denying me advancement or having me fired.

5. Demand submission to drug testing, flu shots, no smoking pledges and other forms of privacy invasion as a condition for employment.

6. Report me to government agencies (INS,etc. I was born here damnit!) as to my place of employment.

7. Tried to coerce me into doing something illegal that could put me in danger of arrest.

8. Lie about benefits.

9. Lie about a crippling injury occuring at work thus denying the validity of claim.

10. Tried to coerce me to work in unsafe working conditions.

These were done to me by capitalists. Socialists I do not like, or ever shall, but I'm under no illusions as to the "sanctity" of capitalism, or the oft proclaimed benevolence/benefits thereof. Anyone who does me an injury is my enemy, left or right.

Copyright © 5-17-13 Jay Agan

Feel free to post this on your blog. Please give proper credit & backlink.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Gabrielle Giffords: Professional Martyr, Predatory Victim

Misguided tool or the face of evil? You decide. I have.

Gabrielle Giffords: Professional Martyr, Predatory Victim

In the letters section of the 4-19-13 edition of the New York Times, there were ten letters in regard to the recent vote-down in the U.S. Senate on expanded background checks on prospective gun buyers. Only two of the ten could be considered pro-gun. Instead of five for, five against, it seems they wanted to give the impression of overwhelming support of new gun laws. A perfect example of media creating "consensus" in favor of editorial policy.

In one of the two pro-gun letters, a Mr. Laurence Frank summed up neatly as to what the so-called "gun lobby" really is:

"The gun control movement completely fails to understand that the "gun lobby" is not the despised National Rifle Association. It is the nearly 100 million Americans who are unwilling to be disarmed by frightened people who are for the most part wholly ignorant about firearms."

There are things I would like to add to the above statement but before I do, I issue this disclaimer:

I do not know Mr. Frank or of any opinions he might have further on this subject. The remainder of this article are my thoughts & opinions only.

Had I written such a letter, I would also have mentioned three other groups seeking the goal of unilateral personal disarmament. In fact, the very ones manipulating & using the above mentioned herd for their own gain &/or their misguided vision of the future. They are:

1. Media creatures - Those declaring/creating concensus where there really is none in order to further ratings & market share. Forget their stats & polls. My own obsevation/personal experience have shown they are bogus. Besides, a free man is a majority of ONE & not swayed by the emotional non-will of the mob.

2. Politicians - Both the "crusaders" & self serving. Their goal is in making people more dependent on them & expand government power.

By the way ... Where was government power during Newtown/Sandy Hook? Oh yes ... Doing its primary job of issuing traffic tickets between stops at the doughnut shop. To be fair, the police can't be everywhere at once. Like most cuckholds, they're really only good for "cleaning up" afterwards.

3. Professional victims - In the '80s & '90s we had the spectacle of James Brady being paraded about as the poster child for heaven on earth (Where the sun always shines & the lolipops dance.). Todays' advocate for "nirvana now" is none other than Gabrielle Giffords. She is the one we're instructed to gaze upon in awe & automatically concede the arguement. She has been touched by the gods & morally annointed from above. Woe to he who doesn't roll over, for IF he doesn't, then one can be then branded as an INSENSITIVE HEARTLESS BASTARD.

Well ... I have news for Ms. Giffords & her handlers:

I ... don't ... care. Why?

Because ... I have been ... & always will be ... an INSENSITIVE HEARTLESS BASTARD!

I am disgusted & repelled by the "irrefutable" example of the martyr as justification for me having to give up what is mine. I am revulsed by the imagined sanctity of those making a claim on me through their "sainthood".

A. Ms. Giffords' wounds are NOT some badge of authority cancelling out my standing in the arguement.

B. Her "martyrdom" & victimhood are NOT shields against my questioning her dubious motives.

C. Her past suffering is NOT a legitimate excuse for moving on MY rights, liberty & property.

She is not a hero.

She is, at best, only a victim.

She has now, willingly, made herself an adversary.

For the moment, I'm giving the greiving relatives of Sandy Hook a pass. As it is now, they are in too much of a state as to resist the attentions of those who would manipulate them. If, down the road, some of them are still allowing for it then I'll have to lump them with Giffords.

Ayn Rand called it "Tyranny of the victim". Those making a claim on you because of their victimhood.

DON'T FALL FOR IT.

Just sayin' ...


The despised link to the despised website of the despised NRA here.

A link to the also despised Gun Owners of America here.

Gun Control: It's Not THE CHILDREN It's THE AGENDA here.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media here.

*Arm Flail* GUNS! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Got this while perusing the 4chan website some time after the Newtown/Sandy Hook incident. As it makes more than enough sense, I'm posting it here:


I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

Yeah ... That's how they "think".

Remember folks, in spite of what CNN et al thinks, you have minds of your own. Use them.


Guns, Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Obama Gun Control Poster

Poster says, "Comrades! Turn In Your Weapons."

Obama Gun Control Poster


Oops! Sorry! Guess it's not one from our earstwhile prez. .... Yet.


And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?

After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria [Government limo] sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur — what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked.

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The GULAG Archipelago


National Rifle Association homepage here.

Gun Owners of America homepage here.

Wikipedia article on Alexander Solzhenitsyn here.

Be sure to check out the "I Second the Motion" section on the right side of this page for more pro-gun links.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

A Distinction (or) a Rantly Screed

A Distinction (or) a Rantly Screed

by

Weatherly Hardy


Our Rights are not granted by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The rights we have are granted by God (or understood as Natural Law by the non-deists out there), and our founding documents merely enumerate them, and set limits on government's ability to infringe upon or limit them.

As much as we appreciate the valiant souls who have fought and died for our Country, they DID NOT "give us our rights", as a popular Facebook picture states. They protect and secure them, as should we all, according to our abilities.

Pretty much says it all ...

Copyright © 1-25-2013 Weatherly Hardy


Aardvarks Plumbline (Mr. Hardys' blog.) here.

Aardvark Tees (Mr. Hardys' company. Shirts!) here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Well Isn't THAT Special! Barack & the Kiddies

Obama exploiting children for political gain.
Because he cares soooooo much!

Well Isn't THAT Special! Barack & the Kiddies


This reminds me of a minor non-incident from the mid 90s'. A Columbus (Ohio) city councilman decided to raise a little stink (He was a little stinker.) over those dreaded "ASSAULT WEAPONS(!)". Seems Rickenbacker air base was being used at the time by several civilian corporations as an entry point for foriegn goods (Some kind of NAFTA deal, I think.).

One company was shipping in older Russian small arms to sell to American wholesalers/distributors. This was back when the then cash strapped Russians were selling anything that could shoot & the U.S. was a more than ready market at the time. I remember well the brochures that came into the gun store/range I was working at the time. There was even litturature from Georgian & Armenian companies with goodies to sell.

Well this doofus got inspired by his pre-teen son & went on a toot about these old commie guns, making it sound as if mountains of full-auto AK47s were being shipped in for the express purpose of spreading murder & mayhem. The good statesman got some press milage/publicity courtesy of the poodle press & riled up the sheeple somewhat. Turns out the guns were mostly old bolt action Nagants & low capacity (10 round, fixed box.) SKS semi-autos.

Oh yeah! What was it that inspired the politico? Something in the line of this:

"Gee daddy ... If guns are so bad ... why are they coming here?"

Out of the mouths of babes? ... No doubt the poor kid grew up to be twice the ideological fool his daddy is.


National Rifle Association home page here.

Gun Owners of America home page here.

Gun Control: It's Not For the Children here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.