Goto Jaysteevee main page here. If Big Brother sees articles under this one then you are already there and not being watched.
The set's not hooked to cable or antenna. It picks up only one channel. A very private one. Unlike cable, it always has something good on. No matter the time, whatever is playing is just starting as I tune in. How can this be? It's my video collection. Hi, I'm Jay. An occasional (very) voice actor lurking in the central Ohio hinterlands. And this is Jays' Tee Vee. My little corner of wierdness on the web. Movies, cartoons, anime. Oh yeah! ... WARNING ... Some politics.
Showing posts with label Big Brother. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Brother. Show all posts
Monday, July 13, 2020
Big Brother Is NOT Watching You!
Goto Jaysteevee main page here. If Big Brother sees articles under this one then you are already there and not being watched.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
A "Word" From the National Guard
A "Word" From the National Guard
The following is a FICTITIOUS "script" for a National Guard public service ad. This is not to malign the National Guard but to be taken in the CAUTIONARY SPIRIT for which it is intended.
Man: I remember the moment clearly.
Woman: I'll never forget that moment.
M: As long as I live.
W: It changed my life.
M: I'd been training with my team for months ... And now had been called up for the first time. At that moment it hit me. This is why I joined the Guard. The real deal.
W: We're soldiers. Always ready to protect our GOVERNMENT. And we have communities ... Family, friends, neighbors who must be closely watched.
M: Free thinking was getting dangerously close to dissent. At that moment, I felt just how important the Guard is to my GOVERNMENT.
W: And I was going to make a difference, right here in my community.
M: Together with local enforcers, we incarcerated dissidents & confiscated weapons & literature. We had to get the people & the situation under control.
W: As a citizen enforcer, I made a difference.
Announcer: Be there ... For your GOVERNMENT. See how the Guard can be an important part of your life & what it means to be a citizen enforcer at ----nationalguard.com.
Copyright © (Article only.) 7-2-13 Jay Agan Feel free to copy & post citing proper credit.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
At the Track
At the Track ...
by
Weatherly Hardy
There are two main time-tracks understood in the world. One derives from a Creator, the other from naturalistic process. This distinction is necessary, because on the one hand, a Creator has built meaning and purpose into His creation, whereas any meaning or purpose in, say, an evolutionary track, must be invented ultimately by any sapience wot comes along. The created sapience owes fealty to the Creator, and obedience, and even love; one need show no sense of gratitude or appreciation, or affection for the impersonal forces driving the evolutionary track.
It is significant that Charles Darwin, he who popularised TENS (the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection) was a lapsed Unitarian/Anglican. (A note: Bishop Usher's 6000-year age of the earth need not apply. The issue is a non-starter, Biblically speaking.) It is important to understand the VAST difference between the two tracks. The Creation provides a framework for understanding cosmology, as well as our own place in the Universe. It establishes an order and purpose for humankind. It especially establishes family, the much touted foundation of society. The silly notion of male and female producing offspring as a family is showcased here. Adam and Eve. Other rhyming names need not.... The Creation Model sets up men and women as families, and defines marriage based upon the Creator's commands and covenants. "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." (Gen. 2:24)
From place names to ancient peoples, the Bible has been proven time and again to be accurate. That is a fair reason to consider its other claims as being so, as well. So what's the point? Marriage is not some sociological accident in antiquity, but derives from a covenant-making God's instruction. With this model, there is coherence, and the growth of mankind through history. There is purpose for the Genesis-model family, beyond (but including) the satisfying of sexual desire. The very structure of society grows from this beginning, and without it, there is no coherent society. Indeed, we are told by Paul: "For this reason I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, 15 from whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named..." (Eph. 3) The world has it backwards. We did not name God "Father" because we wanted a "sky Daddy" to love us. Our families, rather, are named from His Fatherhood.
This is why Marriage=Man+Woman is important, and should be inviolate. Certainly, same-sex couples can adopt, or have surrogates, or in vitro fertilization, and may be loving parents, but it is not according to Hoyle, and is not the foundation provided in the Creation model. The sterile man and wife we-want-it-all marriages are as faulty. (This is no Quiverfull screed ... but fruitfulness IS the norm, not the exception in the Biblical model.)
The problem now is that Government in its mercy has taken over the role of arbiter of What Is Correct. Much as I dislike using the term, from the beginning, marriage has been the purview of religion; it is covenant-based (which is why adultery was punished so severely: death ends a covenant; this includes killing the breaker of a covenant.) Now it is the stuff of bureaucrats and lawyers. Requiring a state license is as legitimate to the purpose of marriage as collecting a tax on the communion elements every Sunday morning. With its oversight, the beneficent State grants privileges and allowances with the marriage license. Those not so entitled are jealous, and want the same benefits as man-and-wife, but they do not fit the model, the original pattern. What to do? Make everyone see it their way, and see how unFAIR it all is. Had marriage remained the realm of the church (now), this would be far less of a problem, but the bottom line is, if we change the definition, we can all pretend we are all equivalent, and it will be FAIR.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."
The naturalist, TENS model offers no such coherence. Whether it is quanta bumping into one another, or whole societies, it is all the accident of Brownian motion writ large: no plan, no purpose, beyond what we Humpty Dumpty for ourselves, and then the definitions don't matter anyway (and no, I do not think I am caricaturing the model). The anyone marrying anyone is not a matter of slippery slopes; it is a matter if it doesn't matter. We are the rule-makers, and we are the deities of dreams.
I wish that I could be more clear in my expression of this. I am still working it out, but despite the various sideroads branching off, there is either the covenant history track, or the accident of nature track. The choice of which model you follow determines your understanding of the Universe, meaning and purpose. Marriage is only one part of it, but if we get that part wrong, the future suffers, as will we.
Copyright © 3/26/2013 Weatherly Hardy
Mr. Hardys' Aardvarks' Plumbline blog main page here.
Aardvark Tees (Movie/TV/anime/cartoon & other related shirts,) here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.
Labels:
Bible,
Big Brother,
big government,
Charles Darwin,
creation,
evolution,
God,
government,
Jesus,
Jesus Christ,
marriage,
natural selection,
relativism,
same sex marriage,
sex,
theological,
theology
Friday, December 28, 2012
Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children"
Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children"
Due to the incident in Connecticut the public has been subjected to a virtual tsunami of "compassion" from the various propaganda outlets. I've never believed for a moment that the expressed concern for the victims of madmen by the talking heads & polititians/parasites to be motivated by anything other than media ratings & expansion of government power. "For the children" is nothing more than a smoke screen for pushing agendas. These creatures dance on the bodies of both the living & the dead for purposes having nothing to do with protecting/promoting anything other than their own interests.
For the media harlots it's a way to popularity & higher ratings. Many of these courtesans (Right as well as left.) work in collusion with their idealogical allies in government. It's advocacy/yellow journalism at it's worst. Instead of just reporting the news, they promote collectivist causes.
For the politicians, it is to manipulate the sheep into going along with their visions of "a better world". That better world being where the individual is helpless & dependant upon government.
Neither of the two actually care about the safety of children or of the general welfare of the country except in terms of how their influence can be expanded. No doubt they're hoping for more Sandy Hooks to exploit.
In the words of Rahm Emmanuel during a November 2008 Wall Street Journal forum:"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
He & other politicians may deny such a statement does not apply to tragic situations but ... Politics is politics & politicians are politicians. Trust them not.
GUN CONTROL IS NOT & NEVER HAS BEEN "FOR THE CHILDREN".
NRA Comes Out Swinging here.
Of Dancing on the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.
National Rifle Association home page here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
"Trials" of a Voice Actor Part 3
"Trials" of a Voice Actor Part 3
by
Jay Agan
I get home after a particularly arduous day at work & am greeted with a message on the machine from my agent. "Get down to XYZ Studio at 10 AM for an anti-smoking radio spot. Pays 200 etc....." O.K!.
Anti-smoking? Hmmmm. I don't mind telling folks what a dumb thing it is to smoke. No sense in hurting yourself & others. Yet .....
I e-mail the agent inquiring wether this is a simple public service announcement or an advocacy of an anti-smoking LAW. He sends me the script.
It was as I feared. The Dept. of Health & Human Services of a state out west wanted to innaugurate the activation of a new LAW voted in by the state legislature a year before. The law affected private businesses (Bars, restaraunts, etc.). The ad agency doing the ad thought my voice perfect for it. Wrong!
As a small L libertarian I believe one has the right to kill oneself as fast or slow as desired as long as no one else is harmed. The government has no right to declare private businesses/property to be public places (If you can't stand the smoke/heat, get the heck out of the bar/kitchen!).
I e-mailed the agent & declined, giving my reasons.
I could have used the 200 bucks (less agents' 20%.). I could have used the exposure (My voice would have been heard all over the state extolling Big Brother.). To heck with it. There are some things I won't do for money.
About a month later, around contract renewal time, I get an e-mail from the agent informing me that due to the bad economy, they were dropping me & others from their roster.
I would like to thank all the well meaning politicians from both parties for helping to make my life less than it could be. It is because of their well intentioned efforts that I & many others have had to put our dreams on hold. Again, thank you. Now go "help" someone else. Like Libya for instance.
Article copyright © 4-5-2011 Jay Agan
Go to Main Page here.
This article may be copied in whole or in part. Please cite proper credit & backlink.
by
Jay Agan
I get home after a particularly arduous day at work & am greeted with a message on the machine from my agent. "Get down to XYZ Studio at 10 AM for an anti-smoking radio spot. Pays 200 etc....." O.K!.
Anti-smoking? Hmmmm. I don't mind telling folks what a dumb thing it is to smoke. No sense in hurting yourself & others. Yet .....
I e-mail the agent inquiring wether this is a simple public service announcement or an advocacy of an anti-smoking LAW. He sends me the script.
It was as I feared. The Dept. of Health & Human Services of a state out west wanted to innaugurate the activation of a new LAW voted in by the state legislature a year before. The law affected private businesses (Bars, restaraunts, etc.). The ad agency doing the ad thought my voice perfect for it. Wrong!
As a small L libertarian I believe one has the right to kill oneself as fast or slow as desired as long as no one else is harmed. The government has no right to declare private businesses/property to be public places (If you can't stand the smoke/heat, get the heck out of the bar/kitchen!).
I e-mailed the agent & declined, giving my reasons.
I could have used the 200 bucks (less agents' 20%.). I could have used the exposure (My voice would have been heard all over the state extolling Big Brother.). To heck with it. There are some things I won't do for money.
About a month later, around contract renewal time, I get an e-mail from the agent informing me that due to the bad economy, they were dropping me & others from their roster.
I would like to thank all the well meaning politicians from both parties for helping to make my life less than it could be. It is because of their well intentioned efforts that I & many others have had to put our dreams on hold. Again, thank you. Now go "help" someone else. Like Libya for instance.
Article copyright © 4-5-2011 Jay Agan
Go to Main Page here.
This article may be copied in whole or in part. Please cite proper credit & backlink.
Labels:
advertising,
anti-smoking,
Big Brother,
freedom,
government,
law,
libertarian,
liberty,
Libya,
political parties,
politicians,
politics,
smoking,
statism,
voice acting,
voice over
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




