40% Of COVID19 Deaths Are Because Of Democrat Governors

 

 Think about it ...

Go to Jaysteevee blog main page here. Already there if you see articles under this one.

Democrats: We're Going To Fix Things This Time, We Promise!

Suuuure you are!

Go to Jaysteevee main page here. If you see any articles below this one I promise you're already there.

A New Term for Trump Derangement Syndrome: Hodgkinsons' Disease

James T. Hodgkinson: Violent, useless asshole ... and liberal.

A New Term for Trump Derangement Syndrome: Hodgkinsons' Disease


Hodgkinsons' Disease

Yeah ... That's a term I'll use from now on.

Think about it.

Jus' sayin' ...


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means yer already there.

My Take On Last November

Hillary Clinton and John Podesta plot campaign strategy.
Photo credit: Metro Goldwyn Meyer

My Take On Last November


This diatribe is off the top 'o my head. I'm not going to use "facts 'n figures", etc.. This is only a retelling of how I experienced last Novembers' miracle.

How the heck did Trumpus Maximus win!? ... But then, how did Clinton lose?

1. From the start, Clinton had a LOT of baggage going in. Folks already had a gut full of her co-presidency of the '90s and the accompanying fireworks of which she was NOT the wide eyed innocent. Her stint as Secretary of State during the Obama regime didn't sit well with a lot of folks either. The Benghazi affair, deleted emails, "What difference does it make?"/evasiveness and doing private business on the companys' time and dime. There was no way she could get out from under such an interesting past.

The negatives Mr. Trump had ...

"GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY! GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY! EEK! EEK! EEK! EEK! HE SAID GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY!"

Man, if that's the worst they could come up with ...

Yeah there were other personal negatives on him, ranging from his personal life, business dealings, tax matters and his blunt manner (Actually a plus!) but they seemed trivial compared to Clintons' "trail of bodies".

The lefts' referring to him and his supporters as fascist, nazi, racist and whateveraphobes really had little effect. Such terms have now pretty much lost their meaning except "I hate you because you disagree with me". These idiots wouldn't know what fascism was (The means of production being privately owned but dictated to by the state.) if Mussolini himself kicked them in the nuts.

And they wouldn't know what racism was (The inner feeling and outward expression of support and unity with those of ones' own race.) if I bit them on the ass.

2. Clintons' communication problems didn't help her either.

A. She didn't really to like talking to people. Didn't like answering questions. Press conferences (Except toward the end.) she avoided as much as possible.

Mr. Trump LOVES to talk. Press conferences, arranged or on the spot, he'd jump right in.

Clinton would give a speech, disappear for awhile, have a rally, disappear awhile ...

Trump was all over the place! Seemingly in more than one place at a time. At least three speeches/rallies a day. He was out hustling, selling the product.

B. While both had FUCK YOU attitudes, Mr. Trump was at least saying FU to the right people such as the Democrat Party, Wall Streeters, elitists, left media, the Republican Party (This endeared him to a LOT of disaffected republicans.) and coprophages like the failed Manchurian candidate, John McCain.

Clinton, on the other hand, FUed the wrong people.

You DON'T go to the heart of coal country saying you're "going to put coal miners and coal companies out of business". What that said to a LOT of folks was she was going to keep/put them out of work. Condescendingly saying how important the environment was but you're going to have them working in "green industries" somewhere down the road (Maybe ... perhaps ... might ... If ever I get around to it ...) doesn't help either. While it certainly was a nicer way of telling all those working stiffs to go to hell, it didn't help her campaign any.

Pennsylvania and West Virginia went red as a consequence.

You don't say (In regard to Trumps' MAGA slogan.) America is already great and that's why you'll continue the policies of the previous administration. Lots of folks already had a heaping helping of that the past eight years. They weren't looking for another four plus.

You don't go calling your opponents supporters "a basket full of deplorables" (Thus giving a new slogan to the other side!). A large number of folks who were sympathetic but hesitant about Trump before, got knocked off the fence and into MAGA over that one. Backtracking and saying you only meant half of your opponents supporters came too lame and too late. Both halves and then some thought you were talking about them.

C. Using the old tried and true method of the "capitol hill shill" (Used in the past by politicos from both sides of the aisle.), Clinton speechified, seemingly more to "groups" and special interests, about how she was right and her opponent wrong using long winded diatribes and at times talking over every ones' heads.

Trumps' style was definitely atypical. He'd directly address peoples problems and made it seem like he was talking personally to working people. "YOU ... are worried about your family, the future of YOUr children. YOU're concerned about safety, national security, terrorism. YOUr job, pay check, taxes, take home, etc.".

The style was simple, direct and ... repetitive. Saying the same things over and over.

This drove both left and right nuts. Not realizing that Mr. Trump was NOT campaigning. He was advertising. Carefully listen to a typical thirty to sixty second radio/TV ad and note how many times the product/solution they're selling is mentioned by name.

I also found his hand gestures and facial expressions interesting. While folks listened with their ears, their eyes were focused on hands and face thus making it easier for the message to register in their minds. I don't know if Mr. Trump was consciously using this "hypnotism" or not but it was fascinating as well as effective.

Trump could be hypnotic whereas Clinton would bore or put people to sleep ... except when she was doing her more than excellent Margaret Hamilton impersonation ("I'll GET you my pretty ... AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOTO TOO!").

3. Crowd sizes:

CNN (Commie News Net) and other propaganda outlets assured us that crowd size at speeches and rallies were no factor in determining the elections' outcome. They correctly cited that Mitt Romney drew larger crowds than Obama in 2012 but still lost.

Howsomever ...

Romney had nowhere near the crowd sizes that Mr. Trump had and Ms. Clintons' were nowhere near that of Obamas'.

In the interest of "fairness", PMSNBC and other alt left media would not turn the cameras around on the crowds. I had a better picture of how things were from alternate print and vid sources on the net. You know ... the "nazis" at Brietbart, the "conspiracy mongers" at Infowars, that "fascist" Drudgereport and all those You Tube "anarchists". They would turn the cameras around.

I'd never seen anything before like it! While Clinton had trouble putting butts in seats at high school auditoriums, Trump had no trouble at all getting OVERFLOW crowds at stadiums and airline hangers. Yeah ... Those huge buildings they park jumbo jets in to get serviced.

The photos of "huddled masses" in front of auditorium stages at Clinton "rallies" were sad and pathetic. Sometimes the combination of the numbers of her paid entourage and the media locusts would rival that of her supporters. The cancelled rally in Florida where Kaine, her running mate was to speak ... Only EIGHT people showed up.

Trump spoke at noon one day at the county fairgrounds in my area. They were turning people away at 10:30 AM.

All through the campaign, media mouth(y)pieces kept declaring that crowd size doesn't translate into votes.

Large numbers of people don't drive for miles/hours to hear someone speak in the full knowledge of a one in four chance they'd be turned away ... and not vote.

4. Wikileaks:

No matter who "hacked" the DNC and others the fact of the matter is that what was in those E-mails was true.

A. Collusion of the Dems and the media to pump Clinton at the expense of Trump.

Dems SHOULD be mad ... but not at Trump. The meat puppets had the rank and file absolutely convinced of Clintons' inevitability. THEY had them believing the throne had already been set up in the White House and the crown and ruby slippers all shined and ready.

So much so, some of them stayed home on election day thinking their votes weren't needed. A lot of them now are out there smashing windows and being the useless little punks they are. So how the hell does that help?

B. Manipulation of the polls:

I read articles about the pollsters oversampling of Dems in order to "weight" their results. I only consulted two polls, LA Times/USC (With its interesting criteria.) which had the two neck and neck and sometimes Rasmussen. The fact the pollsters couldn't reliably gauge the influence and number of "new voters" (Some of whom hadn't voted since the Reagan era!) also had me wondering.

C. The screwing of Bernie Sanders in the primary run:

Yes, there was a "never Trump" movement. What is less well known was the "never Hillary" faction.

Whereas the the anti-Trumpers were party "higher ups"/officials and hacks the anti-Hillary bunch were from the Dem rank and file, many pulling for Sanders.
Clintons' trust issues made many skepticle. The leaks only intensified that. When Sanders lost the nomination a large number ended up voting third party or even Trump (Who said some of the same things about Wall Street as Sanders.).

Sanders "drinking the Kool-Aid" (Jimmy Jones Party Punch!) and backing Clinton made him seem like just another shill to many who then lost faith in the Dem party.

5. The debates:

Of course the alt left "lugenpresse" said Clinton walked away with all three. Bull!

A. The first one had Trump holding his own.

B. As for the second one ...

History has shown the conservative candidate will lose the election if he does not have the support of two groups: Gun Owners and Evangelicals.

Mr. Trump had the gun owners solidly behind him long before the second debate. The National Rifle Association endorsed him BEFORE the Republican National Convention (With Romney, it wasn't until October!) and the rest weren't far behind.

The evangelicals were pretty much with Trump by then but there were still quite a few fence sitters in that quarter. Mr. Trumps' forceful stating of his positions on and Ms. Clintons' rather callous answers to the question about late term and partial birth abortion knocked them right OFF the fence and cemented that faction in the Trump camp.

The "bitter clingers" won big that November.

C. In the third debate, on being asked by Chris Wallace about the deleted E-mails from her stint as Secretary of State, she clumsily ducked the question and wouldn't answer. This didn't sit well with those watching.

6. Enthusiasm:

I've worked at the same place, a university, for the past ten years. This college is no exception when it comes to places of higher learning being hotbeds of indoctrination into the wonders and glories of leftist non-wisdom and bullshit.

The place is covered in "rainbow safe zone" stickers. So it should come as no surprise that the support for Obama was through the roof there.

In both 2008 and 2012 elections, the enthusiasm for that socialist asshole was incredible.

"OOOOOO! ... Our first black president!"

Faculty 'n fools couldn't get enough of him. Posters, get out the vote drives, rallies, etc.. Young  Democrats and other subversive on-campus organisations reserving conference rooms and lounges for meetings and watching the debates.

You get the idea.

2016 ... Nothing.

No, "OOOOOO ... Our first WOMYN president!"

The campus was pretty quiet. Sure, the odd student would make some snide comment about Mr. Trump at the lobby TV now and then and that's about it.

Shoot! Just the other day a fine upstanding "sexual non-conformist", fresh out of viewing a weekly film at the "Queer Film Fest" series in one of the auditoriums shouted a hearty FU! at Fox coverage of Mr. Trumps' recent rally in Pennsyltucky.

During the campaign there was evidence of they and Ms. Clinton being against something. But not really being FOR anything ... Except maybe the "same old, same old" of the past eight years.

Aside from a sign in the lobby on election day offering rides to polling places, I didn't see ANY activity.

I couldn't help but feel Clinton may be having trouble.

7. Last days of the campaign:

A. Whether or not Comeys' letters to Congress about additional Clinton/State Dept. E-mails influenced the election he knew he was going to be accused of supporting one candidate or the other no matter when he announced them. My guess is he decided to avoid criticism of not having announced as soon as he could instead of later. In my view he was only doing CYA and not because it was in support of Trump.

B. Clinton kept doing her comparatively sporadic speechifying (Though she did step up her frequency of press conferences.) while Mr. Trump, as usual, was continually on the hustle and getting his word out.

The weekend before election day Mr. Trump went to all the battleground states and then some. He looked like he wanted to win this one. Maybe it's just me but
Clinton hardly seemed to be mentioned much. Don't you want to win this one, lady?

C. The Wednesday before election day, it was announced the Clinton campaign cancelled the fireworks display that was to happen in the event of a Clinton victory. Did someone in her group know something we didn't?

D. Thursday before election day, a Drudge Report link led me to a You Tube presentation wherein a young lady mentioned that the Clinton campaign was withdrawing people and resources from the battleground states of Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.

Was the campaign staff that confident (Arrogant?) that they didn't need to put that much effort in those important states?

It seems to have been the case considering Ms. Clintons' behavior late November Eight/early November Nine. After finding she was losing, she was in no mental shape to deliver a concession speech and did so much later that morning.

8. Election day:

I wake up, sweating bullets. Usual net reading no comfort at all.

Go in to work in the afternoon (nite shift). Nothing going to happen 'til about eight o'clock. Still sweating.

After eight, Clinton grabs an early lead. Northwest reporting in. Clinton grabs New York, pundits crow about Trump losing his home state (Leaving out the fact his "other" home state, Florida was yet to be counted.).

Of course New York went to Clinton. Fully expected that. No conservative has gotten NY in a looooong time.

About an hour later I glance at the lobby screen. Trump in a small lead that got bigger later which he maintained the rest of the night.

I go home at midnite thirty by which Mr. Trumps' lead was looking pretty good. Michigan, Pennsy and others still close.

I get on Fox streaming and Stormfront.

Yes, THAT Stormfront (Nazis! ... And KluKKers! ... And trolls! ... OH MY!)!

Seems a really hot thread in the Newslinks and Articles section was really going at it. They were practically in "chatroom" mode considering how quick the responses were coming in. Even the Trump haters were rooting for Trump!

So  ... Switching between the two, sweating out the results ...

Let's go Pennsylvania ... Trump leading ... not by much ... but ... he ... just might ...

Michigan looks even narrower. C'moooon Michigan! Go Wolverines!

Yeah, like I care. I'm supposed to be for the OSU Buckeyes but I never gave a dang about them either.

Still switching back and forth awhile. Notice some new entries on the Stormfront thread. Third to the last one:

"AP and Russian News have just declared for Trump. Wooo Hooo!"

Russian News? RT?

Going back to Fox, they're still waffling about the vote. Wallace and company commenting on the stillness of the Clinton NY headquarters and the exuberance at Trumps'. After about ten, fifteen minutes Fox finally gives it to Trump.

I never thought I'd see the day when Fox gets scooped by "Russian News".

9: Conclusion:

Keep in mind, this article is off the top'o my head. If things seem a little sketchy and inexact it's because of the time since and this is only from where I sat through the whole thing.

Right now, Mr. Trump is going through some rocky times, what with the incredible butt hurt the Dems are still going through. Along with the never-
Trumping whinos 'n RINOS like McCain, et al ...

Well ... With Republicans like these ... Who needs Democrats?

Keep in mind, Mr. Trump isn't this all powerful wizard casting spells to instantly make things better. He's only one man and the krap ain't over yet.

So let's get ready for 2018 and 2020. Volunteer, get involved and VOTE!

Jus' sayin ...


Note: My apologies to Margaret Hamilton (The 'Wicked Witch of the West" in The Wizard of Oz. MGM, 1939.) for use of the title photo. She was a GREAT actress!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Ifn' ya sees articles under this 'un already, then yer already there ... MAGA!

Fare Well ... NOT!

Pretty much says it all ...

Fare Well ... NOT!


It's OVER!

After eight years of "sucking it up" and taking it (From chicken Republicans as well as Commun- ... er ... Democrats.) we'll now see wether or not our favorite maverick can urge some steel in our politicians spines and set things right.

I'll let this articles' illustrations "do the talkin' ".

No where to go but ... UP!

As for the departing exec, I hope the door DOES hit him in the posterior on the way out!

Jus' sayin' ...


The Young Turds ... Turks election night meltdown here.

Quicker summary of the above here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Bush the First to Vote for Clinton ... Big Surprise

CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK-servative.

Bush the First to Vote for Clinton ... Big Surprise


Well ... There goes the election ... Looks like this is it ... The end of El Donaldo.

Now that it's rumored George Herbert Walker Bushed, aka: Mr. "Read my lips no new taxes" and Loser of '92 (Helped in part by Ross Perrot who also helped Bob Dull become Loser of '96. BOTH to Billys' willy!) is rumored to be voting for the goblin, it looks like it's curtains for Mr. Trump.

Yessir! The fact that a prominent member of the Republicrat/Demican elite, aka: the Shove It Up Yer Ass Sideways Brush End First With A Twist Party would vote for Hilarity Clinton should convince all those working people and other "deplorables" to do the same.

Pack it in Don ...

IT'S OVER!

Jus' sayin ...


Donald Trump For President here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there as well as deplorable.

Some Memes, Hillary and Otherwise

Some Memes, Hillary and Otherwise

Found these in various places on the interbutts. Thought I'd share ...

And Billy didn't with "that woman"

Could Hillary be taking a cue from this?

She is SO qualified to be president.

Of course Mitt Romney proves you don't
have to have a  vagina to be a cunt.

A "not vote" is a vote FOR Hillary.

Donald Trump for president here.

Republican Party web site here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

It's Called ... Sarcasm

It's Called ... Sarcasm


Taking and editing a quote from Donald Trumps' latest press conference out of context, the pathologicals at CNN, etc. would have you believe Mr. Trump is inviting foreign powers to hack at our government computer nets and engage in espionage in general.

Here's the exact quote:

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let's see if that happens. That'll be next."

The thirty grand reference is in regard to the e-mails that were deleted off the private server Clinton had when she was Secretary of State. The quote itself is in regard to the recent Wikileaks revelation of the Democrat National Committees' e-mails about the low regard the DNC has for its' constituencies and the backstabbing of Bernie Sanders in assuring Clinton of securing the presidential nomination.

The DNC would have you believe the real issue is about Russia hacking into their system (OH NO! It's a commie plot! The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!) and possible complicity by Donald Trump. After all, didn't El Donaldo just welcome their involvement?

BULLSHIT!

1. Whether the Russkies did it or not is NOT the issue. The REAL issue is the DNCs' utter contempt for their constituencies and the American electorate as a whole as proven by the content of their e-mails.

Any Democrats reading this, keep in mind: You don't matter. What matters to the DNC is to get that haridan in the White House and to hell with what you think.

2. What Mr. Trump said is not a declaration of allegiance to a foreign power. What it is is a snarky aside to the DNCs' fear, paranoia and embarrassment at being found out.

It's called ... SARCASM: A form of exaggeration used to point out the stupidities and/or shortcomings of another. In this case, the DNC.

In short ... It's HUMOR.

My message to the DNC, its' sympathizers and other pathologicals.

Screw you ... Even if you CAN take a joke!

That weird web site where I got the illustrations for this article here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you have already arrived.

Hilary ARFS Again!

Hillary ARFS Again!

Mr. Trump put out a new campaign ad ... Check it out!

My ... Precioussssss ...

And now a word from the morally annointed: "Be bop a loola
man! Be bop a loo! Be bop a loola man! Boogedy boogedy shoo!
EEK! EEK! BOOM! BOOM! EEK! EEK!"

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Hillary Clinton ... ARF! ... ARF! ... ARF! ... ... ARF! ... ... ARF!

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!

Hillary Clinton ... ARF! ... ARF! ... ARF! ... ... ARF! ... ... ARF!


WOW! On top of all of her other "talents", (Passing the buck, carelessness with state correspondence, not giving a damn and that FUCK YOU! attitude of hers.) she can do animal imitations!


One can only wonder what else this "wonder woman" is capable of.


You Tube link here. Barking at 1:05.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Cry havoc and let slip the hogs of war.

National Review: A True(?) Reflection of Conservatism

National Review: A True(?) Reflection of Conservatism


So ... Last week the National Review magazine published several rants by various pointy headed "intellects" about Trump NOT being a true conservative and how us hoi paloi should get behind a creature of their own choosing.

True, it's not like we could actually make an intelligent choice and keep being saddled with what these "true believers" think we should have non-representing us.A run away electorate is definitely not to their liking and it would be best for one and all to keep herding along with their vision of the future and contribute to the scene they dictate.

Yeah ... RIGHT!

So what if El Donaldo isn't a "true conservative"? At least he makes no bones about it or hides it.

Yes ... He probably won't (Or can't legally.) put a complete halt to Muslim "immigration" or execute some of the "solutions" to other things he's mentioned.

He probably can't do a lot of the things he says he will but he at least doesn't say these things with too straight a face. Yes, he (To me anyway.) does look like he's giving a knowing wink at you when he says these things, but you KNOW he really does have intentions on doing SOMETHING positive about the situation (Unlike Paul Ryan and company declaring then folding and retreating.). We're just gonna' have to see what form it will take.

Yes, he has admitted to indulging in "crony capitalism" (As opposed to the crony capitalism espoused by neo-cons.), but, as explained by him, it was as a means to coping with government restrictions/interference in his doing business and trying to get things done. Keep in mind, if it wasn't for CRONY SOCIALISM, there wouldn't be a need for crony capitalism.

As for these Sowells, Bozo-ells, Kristols, Charens and other would-be Buckleys ... They're not conservatives either (I tend to leave out Glenn Beck as he has written an excellent little primer about the menace of Islam titled, It IS About Islam.).

A neo-conservative is nothing more than a liberal calling itself a conservative.

Examples:

1. Like libs they believe the global economy is more important than the U.S. economy.

2. They're for mass immigration, not because "diversity is our strength" (Never was.) but because they want cheap labor (Whereas the left wants cheap votes.)

3. While cons vary with the left about our military they're both in accord that it should be used for purposes other than for what it's for: The protection and preservation of the citizens and sovereignty of the ... get this ... THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Yeah ... THOSE United States.

5. They believe a manipulated economy is better than a strong economy. When the market is good, their wallets are good. When the markets are bad, their wallets are still good. Kind of like men and sex ... Even bad sex is still good.

6. Like the collectivists and materialists they are, the individual is nothing more than an economic unit whose value is measured in how he/she is worth in contributing to that collective and how they view as their universe. After all we're just in it.

Of course, as is obvious, I'm for Trump. But ... No matter who gets the GOP nomination ... Get off your ass on election day and vote for whoever the Republicans have running against that crazy broad or that grandfatherly noodnick. Even that worthless Kasich is better than what the Dems want to further inflict on the world!

Yeah ... Somebody mis-spelled but I still like it.

Go to Ex-Army blog here. It's where I got the above Moretsu Pirates/Marika Kato "quibcag"

Go to Trump campaign website here.

The Capitalism/Socialism Non-Difference here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Forget It Sanders, No Apologies

Forget It Sanders, No Apologies


Seems ol' Bern wants white folks to apologize for slavery. Don't think so. Never owned any and any black folks today never were.

This bullkrap no more than just boils down to this:

Calls for apologies and reparations are all about money and the consolidation of political power. They are designed to extract money from guilt ridden Americans to pay for votes to solidify the liberal power base. None of these causes actually help anyone. They are not designed to help but only to keep the underclass voting democrat.

The rest of the article here.

Yup! Bern is wrong on a LOT of things (These last two are for laffs.):

No way Bern ... Misato is best babe!

Go to Godfather Politics main page here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this tells you you're already there. Got that Bern?

13 Hours: A Most Accurate Film

"WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!? IT WASN'T MY RESPONSIBILITY!
... VOTE FOR ME! ... GUN CONTROL! ... GUN CONTROL! ... "

13 Hours: A Most Accurate Film


I understand Michael Bays' upcoming film, 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, to be a very accurate depiction of the events up to and including the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya on 9-11-12.

How do I know this? The broad in the picture above doesn't appear in the movie either.

Benghazi was a much nicer place when Rommel, Monty and Graziani were running about.


Wikipedia article on film, 13 Hours here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If ya' sees articles after this, former first harridan or no, then yer already there.

Bernie Sanders 2016 ... An Economic Revolution is Coming! ... Hallelujah!

Bernie Sanders 2016 ... An Economic Revolution is Coming! ... Hallelujah!


Could it be Mr. Sanders has discovered an inexhaustible power scource? After all, in the words of V I Lenin: "Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country."

Remember kiddies, Socialism/Communism/Liberalism/democrats is NOT about something for nothing.

It's about something from your wallet.

From each according to his ability ... filtered through a fat bureaucracy ... to each according to his disability.

They want theirs and everybodys' cake ... And eat yours too.

Not to worry. It's all in the best of intentions and with your safety and welfare at heart.

I mean ... just because it's never worked before doesn't mean it won't work this time.

C'MON! GIVE IT A CHANCE!

... again ...

No ... really!

Maybe ...

... not.


Go to the blog I got the above "poster" from here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any other articles under this 'un, with or without ol' Bernie means you're already there.

Liberal Jackass

Yeah ... Screw you too ... jackass!


Ex-Army blog main page here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Of Liberals and Quibcags

Of Liberals and Quibcags


quibcag - Quotation Introduced by Cute Anime Girl


I stumbled onto the Ex-Army blog a few months back. The quibcag idea I found to be clever. Though I do find it curious that the website is a racist one what with the anime characters being Japanese and all. All the same, I find the concept of a "quibcag" to be interesting and not all of them have a racist message as evidenced by the three presented here.

Of course it goes without saying that wether one is racist or not, one is automatically a racist when one exhibits opposition in any way shape or form to  liberals. Don't worry about it. They've called me that a lot in the past and it doesn't hurt a bit.

Ex-Army blog here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

8 Things Liberals Do to Avoid an Honest Debate - Broken Down to a Science

8 Things Liberals Do to Avoid an Honest Debate - Broken Down to a Science

from

Internet Journal Review


We've all been there: Stuck in a hopelessly circular argument with a liberal who won’t get to the point, acknowledge basic facts even exist, or get past juvenile name-calling in debates. It can be really frustrating.

One thing people can do to fight back is just to code all the non-responses to logical or rational arguments. Cryptically flipping back “Give me a break with that number 5 nonsense” or “Man, number 3, again?” can really humiliate people whose stupidity is broken down to a science.

So with no further adieu, here is your Rosetta Stone of Liberal Rhetoric (and it can be done with less-than-bright members of other political persuasions).


1. Ad Hominem (Name-Calling aka “You’re a Racist!” etc.)

2. Distracting (aka “Pivoting” aka “Changing the Subject”)

3. Somebody Else Did It Before (aka Two Wrongs Make a Right)

4. Obama Doesn’t Know What’s Going On (Or Did I Do That?)

5. It’s a Far-Right Conspiracy (Or The Koch Brothers Did It).

6. You Heard That on Faux News

7. Argumentum Ad Misericordium (Or “Do it for the Children”)

8. It’s Bush’s Fault

Four years into the weakest recovery in U.S. history, it will always be Bush’s fault in the minds of liberals – even if Obama doubles and triples down on Bush deficits, declares wars without Congressional authorization, signs the Patriot Act by auto-pen, you name it – those things that liberals said they were opposed to under Bush are no longer attached to President Obama.

Sometimes, arguing with radicals seems like an exercise in futility. But remember, you’re not always arguing to change their minds, but the minds of rational people who are observing the debate.

Original article here.

Internet Journal Review here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.


Disclaimer: The illustrations accompanying this article were added by me. The original article, as is, can be seen on the above link.

I Am Officially Revoking My Respect For John McCain’s Service To Our Country

Useless is as useless does ... Go home Johnny ... just ... go home ...

I Am Officially Revoking My Respect For John McCain’s Service To Our Country

Posted by Joe Wurzelbacher on Oct 21, 2013 at joeforamerica.com.


I hold you in utter contempt, as do a great many Americans. You have made a mockery of your service to this great nation, getting far more mileage out of our pity than our embrace, and I call on every veteran to stand against you and stand against your next election campaign. It’s clear that you would stop at nothing to help Obama and his regime, and your actions in recent years have given me, and many like me, no choice but to revoke my respect for you and for your so-called “service” to our country.

Being a veteran of war no longer gives you a pass for being bad for this country. With your express help, liberals have succeeded in destroying much of what made this country great and threaten to ruin the very fabric of America. You've enabled and assisted these Marxists and to continue looking back all those many years to what you did in VietNam as an excuse doesn’t cut it anymore.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above is the last third of an article posted at joeforamerica.com. Pretty much says how I feel about this sad excuse of a "statesman" known as Senator John McCain.

To read the rest click here.

Go to the Joe for America blog main page here.

A Few Words to John McCain here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Official Seal of the United States Democratic Party

Kinda' looks like Harry Reid doesn't it?

Official Seal of the United States Democratic Party

Pretty much says it all. Parasitic bloodsuckers, the lot of 'em!

Grabbed this off of Armand Vaquers' Rancho del Cielo blog, a most interesting web site. Mr. Vaquer is a super Godzilla/Kaiju fan and self appointed ambassador/tourist bureau for Japan. Check his blog out!

WARNING! If you are somewhat to the left of left, faint of heart or very short, DO NOT go to this web site.

Proceed to Amands' Rancho del Cielo here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

The 24 Types of Authoritarians

The 24 Types of Authoritarians


With sports wonk Bob Costas "legislating" from his mouth on CNN (Communist News Network) recently, this little cartoon was brought to mind. Check it out & see if you've "met" any other of his whacky "co-religionists".

I'll admit ... I do identify with a couple of them. Which one(s) are you?

Costas: "Hey! I'm a Cel ... eb ... ri ... teeee! I'VE GOT SOMETHING TO SAY!"

As the Brits would say: "Sod off Bobby!"

In unrelated "news", I wouldn't worry about the "fiscal cliff" overmuch. In regards to the national debt & deficit, I'm sure the Republicrats/Demicans will eventually come to a compromise on kicking the can down the road & leaving the responsibility to others ...

As for tax & spending cuts, I think the Republicrats should just:

Boehner & the bunch should turn their backs on the "annointed one"
 & when the crap hits, let the Demicans "own" it.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.