Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media ... AGAIN

This creature is in the pay of the Saudi and Iran Sharia states.
What else would you expect?

Yeah, I know. I posted this 4chan article a couple times before. In light of the present liberal gun control wankfest, I feel it needs to be read ... AGAIN.


Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

NRA website here.

Donald Trump for president here.

Lying Crooked Hillary dot com here.

That weird political site with the anime pics where I got the above illustration here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. You're already there if there are articles beneath.

Obamas' "Gun Legislation": A Few Questions

Obamas' "Gun Legislation": A Few Questions


Do we have a president or a king?

Are we a nation of laws or of men?

Do we have a constitutional process for legislation or is it by decree?

I do NOT blame Obama. Like all other third world despots he's only doing what comes naturally. So ...

Do we have a Congress or do we have a "rubber stamp" committee?

Do we have real representatives in said Congress who (Unlike the "king".) will fulfill their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution or do we have a cowardly gathering of gutless wonders?

I hope it's the former or at least we acquire one in November.

For those rejoicing in your kings' recent decrees on gun control I ask:

Did it ever occur to you that this could later bite you in the ass?

Did you ever give any thought to the precedent that is being set?

Did you ever think what it may be like in the future when another king, one not to your liking, may come to power and rule by decree over you? Making "law" inimical and damaging to what you might hold dear?

Like most liberals and children, you think only for the moment and of the short term. The unintended consequences of your actions never come to mind until the moment they're staring you in face.

Enjoy your short term. The long one just might be a bitch.


National Rifle Association link here. Be sure to check out the other pro-gun organization links on the right side of this page.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Charleston, Obama, Clinton and the Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media

Charleston, Obama, Clinton and the Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Earlier this week, a pathetic, evil individual shot and killed nine people in a church in Charleston, South Carolina.

Within hours of the shooting, while CNN and other "news" outlets went into their usual frenzy of anti firearms indignation and phony concern, President Barack Obama and Presidential candidate Hilary Clinton stepped up to the mike offering their condolences AND  exploiting the situation for their agendas and garnering votes.

The following is a reposting of an article posted by an annonymous writer on the 4chan website stating what one may expect from politicians, "social reformers", so-called mainstream media and other would-be saviors of your soul in the next few weeks:


Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Got this while perusing the 4chan website some time after the Newtown/Sandy Hook incident. As it makes more than enough sense, I'm posting it here:

I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

Remember folks, in spite of what CNN et al thinks, you have minds of your own. Use them.

Be sure to check out the pro-gun organisation links in the I Second the Motion section on the right side of this page.

Guns, Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.

4chan website here. Warning: CONTAINS CONTENT INAPPROPRIATE FOR CHILDREN.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Gabrielle Giffords: Professional Martyr, Predatory Victim

Misguided tool or the face of evil? You decide. I have.

Gabrielle Giffords: Professional Martyr, Predatory Victim

In the letters section of the 4-19-13 edition of the New York Times, there were ten letters in regard to the recent vote-down in the U.S. Senate on expanded background checks on prospective gun buyers. Only two of the ten could be considered pro-gun. Instead of five for, five against, it seems they wanted to give the impression of overwhelming support of new gun laws. A perfect example of media creating "consensus" in favor of editorial policy.

In one of the two pro-gun letters, a Mr. Laurence Frank summed up neatly as to what the so-called "gun lobby" really is:

"The gun control movement completely fails to understand that the "gun lobby" is not the despised National Rifle Association. It is the nearly 100 million Americans who are unwilling to be disarmed by frightened people who are for the most part wholly ignorant about firearms."

There are things I would like to add to the above statement but before I do, I issue this disclaimer:

I do not know Mr. Frank or of any opinions he might have further on this subject. The remainder of this article are my thoughts & opinions only.

Had I written such a letter, I would also have mentioned three other groups seeking the goal of unilateral personal disarmament. In fact, the very ones manipulating & using the above mentioned herd for their own gain &/or their misguided vision of the future. They are:

1. Media creatures - Those declaring/creating concensus where there really is none in order to further ratings & market share. Forget their stats & polls. My own obsevation/personal experience have shown they are bogus. Besides, a free man is a majority of ONE & not swayed by the emotional non-will of the mob.

2. Politicians - Both the "crusaders" & self serving. Their goal is in making people more dependent on them & expand government power.

By the way ... Where was government power during Newtown/Sandy Hook? Oh yes ... Doing its primary job of issuing traffic tickets between stops at the doughnut shop. To be fair, the police can't be everywhere at once. Like most cuckholds, they're really only good for "cleaning up" afterwards.

3. Professional victims - In the '80s & '90s we had the spectacle of James Brady being paraded about as the poster child for heaven on earth (Where the sun always shines & the lolipops dance.). Todays' advocate for "nirvana now" is none other than Gabrielle Giffords. She is the one we're instructed to gaze upon in awe & automatically concede the arguement. She has been touched by the gods & morally annointed from above. Woe to he who doesn't roll over, for IF he doesn't, then one can be then branded as an INSENSITIVE HEARTLESS BASTARD.

Well ... I have news for Ms. Giffords & her handlers:

I ... don't ... care. Why?

Because ... I have been ... & always will be ... an INSENSITIVE HEARTLESS BASTARD!

I am disgusted & repelled by the "irrefutable" example of the martyr as justification for me having to give up what is mine. I am revulsed by the imagined sanctity of those making a claim on me through their "sainthood".

A. Ms. Giffords' wounds are NOT some badge of authority cancelling out my standing in the arguement.

B. Her "martyrdom" & victimhood are NOT shields against my questioning her dubious motives.

C. Her past suffering is NOT a legitimate excuse for moving on MY rights, liberty & property.

She is not a hero.

She is, at best, only a victim.

She has now, willingly, made herself an adversary.

For the moment, I'm giving the greiving relatives of Sandy Hook a pass. As it is now, they are in too much of a state as to resist the attentions of those who would manipulate them. If, down the road, some of them are still allowing for it then I'll have to lump them with Giffords.

Ayn Rand called it "Tyranny of the victim". Those making a claim on you because of their victimhood.

DON'T FALL FOR IT.

Just sayin' ...


The despised link to the despised website of the despised NRA here.

A link to the also despised Gun Owners of America here.

Gun Control: It's Not THE CHILDREN It's THE AGENDA here.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media here.

*Arm Flail* GUNS! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Got this while perusing the 4chan website some time after the Newtown/Sandy Hook incident. As it makes more than enough sense, I'm posting it here:


I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

Yeah ... That's how they "think".

Remember folks, in spite of what CNN et al thinks, you have minds of your own. Use them.


Guns, Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Guns Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head

It's interesting to note, she turned in her .38 for
purposes of publicity but held on to her .357.
USELESS ELITIST HYPOCRITE!

Guns Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head

Recently, Senator Dianne Feinstein was heard muttering through clenched teeth, about how ALL the polls "showed" Americans were overwhelmingly in favor of gun control measures of all kinds & how congressmen must have the "courage" to defy their constutuencies (The people they're supposed to represent, the majority of which who voted them into office.) & help pass these "measures".

I don't give much credence to polls, especially the ones catering to special interests & done by such "unbiased" groups like CNN. I tend to believe other sources ...

1. Since Newtown/Sandy Hook, gun sales have gone through the roof. Guns (Not just those dreaded ASSAULT WEAPONS.) are clearing the shelves, stocks dwindling, prices going up due to scarcity. Same for ammo, magazines, accessories & gear.

2. The number of requests for background checks through the National Instant Check System (NICS) hit record highs, causing days long delays for individual requests.

3. The membership of the National Rifle Association, in the first ten days after the aforementioned incident, increased by 100,000 members. As of a week & a half ago, by a quarter million. Who knows what it's like for other pro-gun organisations ...

4. Last week - An anti-gun rally was held on the D.C. mall with a WHOPPING grass roots attendance of 600 people (As compared to say, the pro-life fringe groups the day before at the same location. Showing up with only a measly 800,000.). A pro-gun rally in California came up with ONLY about 50,000 in attendance. Yes ... I'm being sarcastic.

You want "polls"? You want stats? Sales figures, etc, seem to be better indicators as to what the people are thinking.

And Feinstein can go on grinding her teeth to nubs for all I care.


National Rifle Association home page here.

Gun Owners of America home page here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not For the Children here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children"

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children"

Due to the incident in Connecticut the public has been subjected to a virtual tsunami of "compassion" from the various propaganda outlets. I've never believed for a moment that the expressed concern for the victims of madmen by the talking heads & polititians/parasites to be motivated by anything other than media ratings & expansion of government power. "For the children" is nothing more than a smoke screen for pushing agendas. These creatures dance on the bodies of both the living & the dead for purposes having nothing to do with protecting/promoting anything other than their own interests.

For the media harlots it's a way to popularity & higher ratings. Many of these courtesans (Right as well as left.) work in collusion with their idealogical allies in government. It's advocacy/yellow journalism at it's worst. Instead of just reporting the news, they promote collectivist causes.

For the politicians, it is to manipulate the sheep into going along with their visions of "a better world". That better world being where the individual is helpless & dependant upon government.

Neither of the two actually care about the safety of children or of the general welfare of the country except in terms of how their influence can be expanded. No doubt they're hoping for more Sandy Hooks to exploit.

In the words of Rahm Emmanuel during a November 2008 Wall Street Journal forum:"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."

He & other politicians may deny such a statement does not apply to tragic situations but ... Politics is politics & politicians are politicians. Trust them not.

GUN CONTROL IS NOT & NEVER HAS BEEN "FOR THE CHILDREN".


NRA Comes Out Swinging here.

Of Dancing on the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.

National Rifle Association home page here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

NRA Comes Out Swinging

NRA Comes Out Swinging

I must admit. I was a little worried. I thought the National Rifle Association would fold & join in the call for more gun bans & the like. I thought Wayne LaPierre & the organisation would take a "new direction", turn on its membership & betray gun owners in general. I thought they would fall in line & do what the haters of the Second Ammendment in particular & the Constitution in general may have been hoping for: Concede the arguement & try to save itself by becoming "more relevant" & "in step" with what the media puts across as a "general concensus" of popular opinion.

In short, surrender & go along to get along by siding with them.

I was wrong. I let the bull crap get to me. I even phoned the NRA & "threatened" that I would remove its' link from this blog if they changed direction. That's what happens when one listens to too much CNN & other establishment propaganda outlets. O me of little faith.

What did happen was, after a week of restraint while the establishment media, their allies among the politicians, celebrities, special interests & other parasite elements ghoulishly exploited the Newtown incident, the NRA came out & stood firm.

The above mentioned sheep in wolves clothing now hate the NRA even more than before ... For being the NRA.

I have, after an absence of many years, decided to rejoin the NRA. Suggest those of you who are sympathetic to do the same.


Wayne LaPierres' 12-21-12 press conference speech & NRA homepage here.

Join the NRA here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.