Wednesday, September 6, 2017
How Many Antifas Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?
Just made these up.
How many antifas does it take to change a light bulb?
Six. One to change the bulb whether it needs it or not and five to beat up anyone who disagrees.
What do you call an antifa without a mask?
What do antifas call a moderate?
What is an antifas' idea of open mindedness?
Dating a communist.
You get the idea. Ridicule is an effective weapon. USE IT!
Sadly, Mr. Traven , the guy who made the above graphic, may have "left the scene" thus the web addy on the graphic is a dead link. I really liked his "quibcags" (Quote introduced by cute anime girl.). Have downloaded a bunch of them and intend to use them in the future.
Go to Jays Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this 'un means yer already there.
Thursday, June 29, 2017
|Kids ... STAY AWAY FROM THIS GUY!|
Yeah Elmo, I always knew you were an opportunistic little phony. Your little stint on CNN (Commie/Clinton News Net) impressed no one who bothers to think.
Link to old article of mine exposing the real Elmo here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this 'un means yer already there. Freakin' Elmo!
DISCLAIMER: All images used on this blog are strictly copyrights of their owners. I do not claim credit/ownership for any images used here in my blog unless stated otherwise.
Thursday, June 15, 2017
|James T. Hodgkinson: Violent, useless asshole ... and liberal.|
A New Term for Trump Derangement Syndrome: Hodgkinsons' Disease
Yeah ... That's a term I'll use from now on.
Think about it.
Jus' sayin' ...
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means yer already there.
Friday, June 2, 2017
A Gun In the House!
Seen in a guest registry at a wedding:
"Keep a gun or two in the house.
"You will be reminded of your love and strengthen your respect for each other every time you resolve a conflict with words instead."
Never quite looked at it that way ...
Jus' sayin' ...
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there. No need to check your guns at the door.
Thursday, May 25, 2017
HATE HAS A HOME HERE
Hate Has No Home Here ...
... or so the posters, signs and shirts of sanctimony say.
That's okay ... The little guy's at my place.
A long while back as a kid, I was out playing in the neighborhood and ran into him.
There he was, looking kind of sad, lonely and lost. He looked at me with those big brown eyes of his and I couldn't resist.
I bent down, petted him and gave him some of the beef jerky I had.
Long story short, he followed me home (Or so I told my parents.).
"Now Jay," Mom and Dad explained and set out the rules. "You're going to have to take care of him. Feed him, clean him and groom him. HE'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY."
Little fella's been at my place ever since.
He's a BIG dog now. :)
Jus' sayin' ...
|The wise sage, Katy Perry says: "No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist."|
She is so wise ...
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there. If not, go ahead and click on the link. I'll hate you if you don't.
Thursday, May 11, 2017
|Nurse Joy and Officer Jenny in action. Don't know who/what the critter is.|
If Pokemon Was More Like This ...
Or like this:
Shoot! Id've watched the show then! Kiddee stuff ...
Jus' sayin' ...
Wikipedia article on Pokemon here.
Wikipedia article on It here. I think I'll skip the movie remake.
Pokemon Go Be Racis'! here.
Pokemon ... Uh ... Yeah here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there. There are no pokemons there. Not even diglets!
Friday, April 28, 2017
|Couldn't find a suitable Inception demotivational but|
this pretty much sums up my feels for that piece of crap.
Inception: A Mini Non-Review
"Saw" only the first few minutes. All I could make out while gazing at the low light/no light, brown filtered/gelled, epileptically edited action(?) opening were semi-vague humanoid shapes, and extreme close-ups of body parts and talking heads. Something about going down a rope out of a window or off a balcony was involved ... I think.
After a few minutes, I took the disc out and threw it away. What the heck, it was only a three buck Goodwill buy so it didn't break my wallet. I'm going to miss those three dollars though ...
My new criteria for movie watching is:
If I can see better in the dark than I can see watching a movie then I'm NOT watching that flick.
Why does Hollywood do this? Why do they make flicks that are visually strenuous to watch?
They may say it's art.
They may sat it's cinematography.
They may say it's "en scene".
Horseshit! It's garbage!
At least any PC bull crap that might be in the flicks they make these days is less effective in propagandizing if they're hard to see.
Jus' sayin' ...
Why I can't watch todays' movies here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this one means you're already there. You're sure to SEE them.
Friday, April 14, 2017
|At least those guys in Pamplona have sense enough to run.|
Fearless-ly STUPID Girl
Arturo Di Modica is attempting to nullify the femi-fascist movements' co-opting of his Charging Bull sculpture. Good for him.
Mr. Di Midicas' lawyer says:
"The statue of the young girl becomes the Fearless Girl only because of the Charging Bull:
"The work is incomplete without Mr. Di Modicas' Charging Bull, and as such it constitutes a derivative work."
I myself agree. The positioning, of the figure as well as the cast and "finish" of it makes it look an attempt at making it look like it goes with the Di Modica work.
Instead of a symbol of what Mr. Di Modica intended, "The strength of America, the strength of the market." The statue was originally installed in front of the New York Stock Exchange in 1987 after the stock market crash of that year.
Now it looks like a tableau of a stupid little girl taunting a large animal and about to get pounded into the dirt and not what its plaque says about "the power of women" (They spelled it wrong! Shouldn't it be "the power of WOMYN"?).
Well I guess two can play at that game.
Hows' about a statue dubbed "Sneering SS Guard" in front of the National Holocaust Museum?
Or "Defiant KluKKer" on the sidewalk in front of Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church?
Maybe "Sword Swinging Jap Fanatic" near the National World War II Memorial on the mall in Washington, D.C.?
Yes, there's nothing like "the power of WOMYN(!)" by rubbing someone elses' nose in it.
We don't do it. There's no reason the "left" should either.
Maybe the matter can be settled by just re-naming it "Stupid About To Be Gored, Flung and Stomped Into the Ground Girl".
Jus' sayin' ...
|Kinda' reminds you of this, doesn't it?|
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this 'un means yer already there.
Thursday, April 6, 2017
|For a better look, right click/copy to desktop/view..|
The 24 Types of Anti-White
Yeah. You've probably met at least half of these jerks in your travels. Usually they're a combo of two or more. Sadly, a lot of so-called conservatives share many of these traits.
Link to the Stormfront thread (Yeah ... THAT Stormfront!) where I got the above graphic here. Nazis! and KluKKers! and Trolls! ... Oh my!
Link to original artwork, The 24 Types of Authoritarians here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.
Friday, March 31, 2017
|HOLY SHIRT! ... It's a Vincent Price!|
That Is One Pesky Critter!
Scary thing happened earlier this week ...
We've all had problems with varmints. Y'know, coons, possums, skunks 'n roaches.
Had a bit of a problem with a rather unique one. So unique and rarely encountered that it makes the endangered species list now and then.
I'm in my living room reading and I happened to look up and-
There ... Standing right next to the TV was ...
A Vincent Price!
Staring right at me ... just ... staring ... AT ME!
Now I did a bit of reading up on this critter some years back. The Vincent Price isn't content to hide under your porch or sink. Attics and cellars have some attraction to them but they mainly like to get in your house proper and just ... Stare at you.
It's really, really, CREEEEEEEPY when they do that.
So I call up the Humane Society and they send a couple guys down to pick it up.
They come in with this humungous, spring loaded box trap. Setting it in the center of the floor, they then baited it with a bottle of Dom Perignon '54 and a large round of brie. That nailed the sucker!
A couple hours after they took it away, I got a phone call from the Society thanking me for having helped in preserving an endangered species.
On asking what they did with the Vincent Price, I was told that it was taken to Hoover Reservoir Park where it was allowed to run free.
Gives me a feeling of the "warm 'n fuzzies" inside.
Don't believe me? Yeah ... just you wait until you find one of those scary things in your house. That'll 'larn ya I'll betcha'!
Jus' sayin' ...
Perfect examples of Vincent Price infestation here and here.
Wikipedia article on Vincent Price here.
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If any articles are already staring at you from under this one then you're already there.
Thursday, March 23, 2017
|Hillary Clinton and John Podesta plot campaign strategy.|
Photo credit: Metro Goldwyn Meyer
My Take On Last November
This diatribe is off the top 'o my head. I'm not going to use "facts 'n figures", etc.. This is only a retelling of how I experienced last Novembers' miracle.
How the heck did Trumpus Maximus win!? ... But then, how did Clinton lose?
1. From the start, Clinton had a LOT of baggage going in. Folks already had a gut full of her co-presidency of the '90s and the accompanying fireworks of which she was NOT the wide eyed innocent. Her stint as Secretary of State during the Obama regime didn't sit well with a lot of folks either. The Benghazi affair, deleted emails, "What difference does it make?"/evasiveness and doing private business on the companys' time and dime. There was no way she could get out from under such an interesting past.
The negatives Mr. Trump had ...
"GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY! GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY! EEK! EEK! EEK! EEK! HE SAID GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY!"
Man, if that's the worst they could come up with ...
Yeah there were other personal negatives on him, ranging from his personal life, business dealings, tax matters and his blunt manner (Actually a plus!) but they seemed trivial compared to Clintons' "trail of bodies".
The lefts' referring to him and his supporters as fascist, nazi, racist and whateveraphobes really had little effect. Such terms have now pretty much lost their meaning except "I hate you because you disagree with me". These idiots wouldn't know what fascism was (The means of production being privately owned but dictated to by the state.) if Mussolini himself kicked them in the nuts.
And they wouldn't know what racism was (The inner feeling and outward expression of support and unity with those of ones' own race.) if I bit them on the ass.
2. Clintons' communication problems didn't help her either.
A. She didn't really to like talking to people. Didn't like answering questions. Press conferences (Except toward the end.) she avoided as much as possible.
Mr. Trump LOVES to talk. Press conferences, arranged or on the spot, he'd jump right in.
Clinton would give a speech, disappear for awhile, have a rally, disappear awhile ...
Trump was all over the place! Seemingly in more than one place at a time. At least three speeches/rallies a day. He was out hustling, selling the product.
B. While both had FUCK YOU attitudes, Mr. Trump was at least saying FU to the right people such as the Democrat Party, Wall Streeters, elitists, left media, the Republican Party (This endeared him to a LOT of disaffected republicans.) and coprophages like the failed Manchurian candidate, John McCain.
Clinton, on the other hand, FUed the wrong people.
You DON'T go to the heart of coal country saying you're "going to put coal miners and coal companies out of business". What that said to a LOT of folks was she was going to keep/put them out of work. Condescendingly saying how important the environment was but you're going to have them working in "green industries" somewhere down the road (Maybe ... perhaps ... might ... If ever I get around to it ...) doesn't help either. While it certainly was a nicer way of telling all those working stiffs to go to hell, it didn't help her campaign any.
Pennsylvania and West Virginia went red as a consequence.
You don't say (In regard to Trumps' MAGA slogan.) America is already great and that's why you'll continue the policies of the previous administration. Lots of folks already had a heaping helping of that the past eight years. They weren't looking for another four plus.
You don't go calling your opponents supporters "a basket full of deplorables" (Thus giving a new slogan to the other side!). A large number of folks who were sympathetic but hesitant about Trump before, got knocked off the fence and into MAGA over that one. Backtracking and saying you only meant half of your opponents supporters came too lame and too late. Both halves and then some thought you were talking about them.
C. Using the old tried and true method of the "capitol hill shill" (Used in the past by politicos from both sides of the aisle.), Clinton speechified, seemingly more to "groups" and special interests, about how she was right and her opponent wrong using long winded diatribes and at times talking over every ones' heads.
Trumps' style was definitely atypical. He'd directly address peoples problems and made it seem like he was talking personally to working people. "YOU ... are worried about your family, the future of YOUr children. YOU're concerned about safety, national security, terrorism. YOUr job, pay check, taxes, take home, etc.".
The style was simple, direct and ... repetitive. Saying the same things over and over.
This drove both left and right nuts. Not realizing that Mr. Trump was NOT campaigning. He was advertising. Carefully listen to a typical thirty to sixty second radio/TV ad and note how many times the product/solution they're selling is mentioned by name.
I also found his hand gestures and facial expressions interesting. While folks listened with their ears, their eyes were focused on hands and face thus making it easier for the message to register in their minds. I don't know if Mr. Trump was consciously using this "hypnotism" or not but it was fascinating as well as effective.
Trump could be hypnotic whereas Clinton would bore or put people to sleep ... except when she was doing her more than excellent Margaret Hamilton impersonation ("I'll GET you my pretty ... AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOTO TOO!").
3. Crowd sizes:
CNN (Commie News Net) and other propaganda outlets assured us that crowd size at speeches and rallies were no factor in determining the elections' outcome. They correctly cited that Mitt Romney drew larger crowds than Obama in 2012 but still lost.
Romney had nowhere near the crowd sizes that Mr. Trump had and Ms. Clintons' were nowhere near that of Obamas'.
In the interest of "fairness", PMSNBC and other alt left media would not turn the cameras around on the crowds. I had a better picture of how things were from alternate print and vid sources on the net. You know ... the "nazis" at Brietbart, the "conspiracy mongers" at Infowars, that "fascist" Drudgereport and all those You Tube "anarchists". They would turn the cameras around.
I'd never seen anything before like it! While Clinton had trouble putting butts in seats at high school auditoriums, Trump had no trouble at all getting OVERFLOW crowds at stadiums and airline hangers. Yeah ... Those huge buildings they park jumbo jets in to get serviced.
The photos of "huddled masses" in front of auditorium stages at Clinton "rallies" were sad and pathetic. Sometimes the combination of the numbers of her paid entourage and the media locusts would rival that of her supporters. The cancelled rally in Florida where Kaine, her running mate was to speak ... Only EIGHT people showed up.
Trump spoke at noon one day at the county fairgrounds in my area. They were turning people away at 10:30 AM.
All through the campaign, media mouth(y)pieces kept declaring that crowd size doesn't translate into votes.
Large numbers of people don't drive for miles/hours to hear someone speak in the full knowledge of a one in four chance they'd be turned away ... and not vote.
No matter who "hacked" the DNC and others the fact of the matter is that what was in those E-mails was true.
A. Collusion of the Dems and the media to pump Clinton at the expense of Trump.
Dems SHOULD be mad ... but not at Trump. The meat puppets had the rank and file absolutely convinced of Clintons' inevitability. THEY had them believing the throne had already been set up in the White House and the crown and ruby slippers all shined and ready.
So much so, some of them stayed home on election day thinking their votes weren't needed. A lot of them now are out there smashing windows and being the useless little punks they are. So how the hell does that help?
B. Manipulation of the polls:
I read articles about the pollsters oversampling of Dems in order to "weight" their results. I only consulted two polls, LA Times/USC (With its interesting criteria.) which had the two neck and neck and sometimes Rasmussen. The fact the pollsters couldn't reliably gauge the influence and number of "new voters" (Some of whom hadn't voted since the Reagan era!) also had me wondering.
C. The screwing of Bernie Sanders in the primary run:
Yes, there was a "never Trump" movement. What is less well known was the "never Hillary" faction.
Whereas the the anti-Trumpers were party "higher ups"/officials and hacks the anti-Hillary bunch were from the Dem rank and file, many pulling for Sanders.
Clintons' trust issues made many skepticle. The leaks only intensified that. When Sanders lost the nomination a large number ended up voting third party or even Trump (Who said some of the same things about Wall Street as Sanders.).
Sanders "drinking the Kool-Aid" (Jimmy Jones Party Punch!) and backing Clinton made him seem like just another shill to many who then lost faith in the Dem party.
5. The debates:
Of course the alt left "lugenpresse" said Clinton walked away with all three. Bull!
A. The first one had Trump holding his own.
B. As for the second one ...
History has shown the conservative candidate will lose the election if he does not have the support of two groups: Gun Owners and Evangelicals.
Mr. Trump had the gun owners solidly behind him long before the second debate. The National Rifle Association endorsed him BEFORE the Republican National Convention (With Romney, it wasn't until October!) and the rest weren't far behind.
The evangelicals were pretty much with Trump by then but there were still quite a few fence sitters in that quarter. Mr. Trumps' forceful stating of his positions on and Ms. Clintons' rather callous answers to the question about late term and partial birth abortion knocked them right OFF the fence and cemented that faction in the Trump camp.
The "bitter clingers" won big that November.
C. In the third debate, on being asked by Chris Wallace about the deleted E-mails from her stint as Secretary of State, she clumsily ducked the question and wouldn't answer. This didn't sit well with those watching.
I've worked at the same place, a university, for the past ten years. This college is no exception when it comes to places of higher learning being hotbeds of indoctrination into the wonders and glories of leftist non-wisdom and bullshit.
The place is covered in "rainbow safe zone" stickers. So it should come as no surprise that the support for Obama was through the roof there.
In both 2008 and 2012 elections, the enthusiasm for that socialist asshole was incredible.
"OOOOOO! ... Our first black president!"
Faculty 'n fools couldn't get enough of him. Posters, get out the vote drives, rallies, etc.. Young Democrats and other subversive on-campus organisations reserving conference rooms and lounges for meetings and watching the debates.
You get the idea.
2016 ... Nothing.
No, "OOOOOO ... Our first WOMYN president!"
The campus was pretty quiet. Sure, the odd student would make some snide comment about Mr. Trump at the lobby TV now and then and that's about it.
Shoot! Just the other day a fine upstanding "sexual non-conformist", fresh out of viewing a weekly film at the "Queer Film Fest" series in one of the auditoriums shouted a hearty FU! at Fox coverage of Mr. Trumps' recent rally in Pennsyltucky.
During the campaign there was evidence of they and Ms. Clinton being against something. But not really being FOR anything ... Except maybe the "same old, same old" of the past eight years.
Aside from a sign in the lobby on election day offering rides to polling places, I didn't see ANY activity.
I couldn't help but feel Clinton may be having trouble.
7. Last days of the campaign:
A. Whether or not Comeys' letters to Congress about additional Clinton/State Dept. E-mails influenced the election he knew he was going to be accused of supporting one candidate or the other no matter when he announced them. My guess is he decided to avoid criticism of not having announced as soon as he could instead of later. In my view he was only doing CYA and not because it was in support of Trump.
B. Clinton kept doing her comparatively sporadic speechifying (Though she did step up her frequency of press conferences.) while Mr. Trump, as usual, was continually on the hustle and getting his word out.
The weekend before election day Mr. Trump went to all the battleground states and then some. He looked like he wanted to win this one. Maybe it's just me but
Clinton hardly seemed to be mentioned much. Don't you want to win this one, lady?
C. The Wednesday before election day, it was announced the Clinton campaign cancelled the fireworks display that was to happen in the event of a Clinton victory. Did someone in her group know something we didn't?
D. Thursday before election day, a Drudge Report link led me to a You Tube presentation wherein a young lady mentioned that the Clinton campaign was withdrawing people and resources from the battleground states of Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
Was the campaign staff that confident (Arrogant?) that they didn't need to put that much effort in those important states?
It seems to have been the case considering Ms. Clintons' behavior late November Eight/early November Nine. After finding she was losing, she was in no mental shape to deliver a concession speech and did so much later that morning.
8. Election day:
I wake up, sweating bullets. Usual net reading no comfort at all.
Go in to work in the afternoon (nite shift). Nothing going to happen 'til about eight o'clock. Still sweating.
After eight, Clinton grabs an early lead. Northwest reporting in. Clinton grabs New York, pundits crow about Trump losing his home state (Leaving out the fact his "other" home state, Florida was yet to be counted.).
Of course New York went to Clinton. Fully expected that. No conservative has gotten NY in a looooong time.
About an hour later I glance at the lobby screen. Trump in a small lead that got bigger later which he maintained the rest of the night.
I go home at midnite thirty by which Mr. Trumps' lead was looking pretty good. Michigan, Pennsy and others still close.
I get on Fox streaming and Stormfront.
Yes, THAT Stormfront (Nazis! ... And KluKKers! ... And trolls! ... OH MY!)!
Seems a really hot thread in the Newslinks and Articles section was really going at it. They were practically in "chatroom" mode considering how quick the responses were coming in. Even the Trump haters were rooting for Trump!
So ... Switching between the two, sweating out the results ...
Let's go Pennsylvania ... Trump leading ... not by much ... but ... he ... just might ...
Michigan looks even narrower. C'moooon Michigan! Go Wolverines!
Yeah, like I care. I'm supposed to be for the OSU Buckeyes but I never gave a dang about them either.
Still switching back and forth awhile. Notice some new entries on the Stormfront thread. Third to the last one:
"AP and Russian News have just declared for Trump. Wooo Hooo!"
Russian News? RT?
Going back to Fox, they're still waffling about the vote. Wallace and company commenting on the stillness of the Clinton NY headquarters and the exuberance at Trumps'. After about ten, fifteen minutes Fox finally gives it to Trump.
I never thought I'd see the day when Fox gets scooped by "Russian News".
Keep in mind, this article is off the top'o my head. If things seem a little sketchy and inexact it's because of the time since and this is only from where I sat through the whole thing.
Right now, Mr. Trump is going through some rocky times, what with the incredible butt hurt the Dems are still going through. Along with the never-
Trumping whinos 'n RINOS like McCain, et al ...
Well ... With Republicans like these ... Who needs Democrats?
Keep in mind, Mr. Trump isn't this all powerful wizard casting spells to instantly make things better. He's only one man and the krap ain't over yet.
So let's get ready for 2018 and 2020. Volunteer, get involved and VOTE!
Jus' sayin ...
Note: My apologies to Margaret Hamilton (The 'Wicked Witch of the West" in The Wizard of Oz. MGM, 1939.) for use of the title photo. She was a GREAT actress!
Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Ifn' ya sees articles under this 'un already, then yer already there ... MAGA!