Inception: A Mini Non-Review

Couldn't find a suitable Inception demotivational but
this pretty much sums up my feels for that piece of crap.

Inception: A Mini Non-Review


"Saw" only the first few minutes. All I could make out while gazing at the low light/no light, brown filtered/gelled, epileptically edited action(?) opening were semi-vague humanoid shapes, and extreme close-ups of body parts and talking heads. Something about going down a rope out of a window or off a balcony was involved ... I think.

After a few minutes, I took the disc out and threw it away. What the heck, it was only a three buck Goodwill buy so it didn't break my wallet. I'm going to miss those three dollars though ...

My new criteria for movie watching is:

If I can see better in the dark than I can see watching a movie then I'm NOT watching that flick.

Why does Hollywood do this? Why do they make flicks that are visually strenuous to watch?

They may say it's art.

They may sat it's cinematography.

They may say it's "en scene".

Horseshit! It's garbage!

At least any PC bull crap that might be in the flicks they make these days is less effective in propagandizing if they're hard to see.

Jus' sayin' ...


Why I can't watch todays' movies here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this one means you're already there. You're sure to SEE them.

Fearless-ly STUPID Girl

At least those guys in Pamplona have sense enough to run.

Fearless-ly STUPID Girl


Arturo Di Modica is attempting to nullify the femi-fascist movements' co-opting of his Charging Bull sculpture. Good for him.

Mr. Di Midicas' lawyer says:

"The statue of the young girl becomes the Fearless Girl only because of the Charging Bull:

"The work is incomplete without Mr. Di Modicas' Charging Bull, and as such it constitutes a derivative work."

I myself agree. The positioning, of the figure as well as the cast and "finish" of it makes it look an attempt at making it look like it goes with the Di Modica work.

Instead of a symbol of what Mr. Di Modica intended, "The strength of America, the strength of the market." The statue was originally installed in front of the New York Stock Exchange in 1987 after the stock market crash of that year.

Now it looks like a tableau of a stupid little girl taunting a large animal and about to get pounded into the dirt and not what its plaque says about "the power of women" (They spelled it wrong! Shouldn't it be "the power of WOMYN"?).

Well I guess two can play at that game.

Hows' about a statue dubbed "Sneering SS Guard" in front of the National Holocaust Museum?

Or "Defiant KluKKer" on the sidewalk in front of Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church?

Maybe "Sword Swinging Jap Fanatic" near the National World War II Memorial on the mall in Washington, D.C.?

Ridiculous ...

Yes, there's nothing like "the power of WOMYN(!)" by rubbing someone elses' nose in it.

We don't do it. There's no reason the "left" should either.

Maybe the matter can be settled by just re-naming it "Stupid About To Be Gored, Flung and Stomped Into the Ground Girl".

Jus' sayin' ...

Kinda' reminds you of this, doesn't it?

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this 'un means yer already there.