THANK GOD FOR MOTHER RUSSIA!

Those who've seen the Hetalia anime get the joke.
credit: awesomeariel

THANK GOD FOR MOTHER RUSSIA!


First ... I believe that any hacking into private computer e-mails, data bases, etc. to be unethical. As a "small L" libertarian I believe privacy sacred. If the Russians did "hack" into the e-mails of the DNC and others to influence the election then what they did was wrong ... period.

But ...

I still can't shake the feeling of relief I have over how the election turned out. I can't help but feel good about what was revealed in those e-mails may have helped in keeping that vile creature from gaining the presidency regardless of possible Russian involvement.

So ...

Were the Russians involved? Maybe ... Maybe not. Yes, the malicious codes used by the Russians in the past were used in this. However, these codes have been found by "white hat" hackers and posted out on the net for all the world to see for several years now. Anyone savvy enough to use them could and SOMEONE obviously did.

Other than that, there's not much in the way of evidence presented to show that the Russkies did it.

But if so ...

Thank God for Mother Russia!

At least this time.

And ...

Wether the Russ were involved or not doesn't mitigate the fact that what was revealed on those hacked e-mails ARE true.

They show the correspondence of DNC members on:

1. Collusion with (fake) news media organizations in supporting Clinton. "It's not fake if WE manipulate, play up or even make it up!"

2. How the DNC was screwing Bernie Sanders during primary season. Trotsky loses again!

3. How various polling organizations would manipulate data in supporting Clinton.

4. Donna Brazile giving Clinton "heads up" on some debate questions that would be asked during the primary season.

Does my being happy of alleged Russian involvement in the election make me a cynical hypocrite in light of my opposition to hacking for any reason?

Yeah ...

But hey ... The left does "the same thing".

Whatever it is, if we do it, it's wrong, evil, racist, dirty, etc. When they do it, it's "social justice".

Its ...

"Friends on the left, none on the right."

And ...

"It's not fascism if the right people are doing it."

The left has taught us well if we'd only learn from it.

To the left in general I say: Yes ... I'm just as hypocritical and rotten as you are.

But you're no where near as happy as I am right now.

Jus' sayin' ...

Lesson learned: Don't grab the handle on your way out!

"Evidence" of more hacking by those vile Russkies here. Turns out to be a LEEEEETLE different from what that paragon of journalism, THE WASHINGTON POST, says it is.

El Donaldos' New Years' greetings here and here (Second link mostly about Russ hacking.).  All hail TRUMPUS MAXIMUS. Yea verily!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. You haven't been hacked if ya' sees articles under this 'un already. It just means yer already there.

Marijuana Legalization In Ohio: The Good News and the Bad News

Robert Mitchum would have been more appropriate.

Marijuana Legalization In Ohio: The Good News and the Bad News


The good news is ...

Marijuana is STILL illegal in Ohio.

The bad news is ...

Marijuana is STILL illegal in Ohio.

Look ... I'm all for the DECRIMINALISING of weed. The laws are stupid. There are too many people in jail who shouldn't be. The present situation hardly protects anyone. And it short circuits natural selection.

But Legalize!?

Issue 3, if it had become part of the Ohio constitution, was a bad deal.

It would have made for even more stupid law. Folks in jail would have still had to fill out sentences. It would have increased the size, reach and expense of government. And it would have granted, TO A SELECT FEW, the green light to operate "plantations" for the growing of weed thus creating a tax funded, government approved monopoly.

Someone was going to come out ahead but it wasn't going to be the taxpayer and/or necessarily the smoker.

It was a bad deal all around.

Link from My Way News here.

I'm Voting NO! On Ohios' Issue 3: On Solid Libertarian Grounds here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. High or not, if there's articles under this 'un, yer already there.

I'm Voting NO! On Ohios' Issue 3 ... On Solid Libertarian Grounds

This piece is off the top 'o my head so if it comes across as a bit disjointed please take that into consideration.


I'm Voting NO! On Ohios' Issue 3 ... On Solid Libertarian Grounds


One would think that if one is libertarian (Note the SMALL "L"!) one would be all for voting yes on Ohios' Issue 3, Marijuana Reform. I for one will not ... And here's why.

The Delaware Gazette, in its' 10-15-15 issue published an article (With an insert of the official proposed amendment literature from the Ohio Secretary of State office.) on the pros and cons:

Pro:

1. Personal choice - Allowing one 21 or older to possess up to 9 ounces of weed.

So what? It still sets limits on how much one can posses.

2. Compassionate care - Authorizes non-profit dispensaries for medical marijuana.

Who pays for those "non-profit dispensaries"?

3. Tax Revenue - Is expected to generate more than 550 million in revenue.

I guess that's what's gonna pay for the above dispensaries ... maybe. What if it doesn't? What if it's not enough?  And even what if it does? Is all that money going to be for the above or wasted on other government programs?

4. Regulated Industry - An independent commission will oversee the growth and sale of weed.

REGULATE! REGULATE! REGULATE!

TAX! TAX! TAX!

GOVERNMENT!

GOVERNMENT!

GOVERNMENT!

Independent commission? If it's government, it's NOT independent!

By the way, the official Proposed Constitutional Amendment literature uses the words "tightly regulated industry" in regard to this commissions' duties.

Con:

1. Creates Monopoly - Ten facilities will have EXCLUSIVE rights to grow weed. Interestingly enough, the official Ohio secretary of state summary document DOES use the word, monopoly!

ONLY ten "facilities". Isn't that nice. Sounds like a GOVERNMENT monopoly alright.

2. Tax rate - A preferential tax rate is set into the Ohio Constitution that can't be changed by legislation like rates on beer, wine and tobacco.

Ah taxes again. I really don't care about the above except that it allows GOVERNMENT (!) to tax it, period.

3. Risk to children - Outlets will be allowed to sell weed-laced products like candy and cookies.

I seriously doubt such products will be allowed by law to be sold to kids. Same limits as in smokes, alky and drugs.

Of course, as we all know, it's best everyone be banned from owning anything (Drugs, weed, guns, books, vid games, internet, media, porn, candy, cookies, fun, anything hot or sharp, etc.). It's for the children after all. If banning everything will save the fictional life of a hypothetical child not related to you then a police state is entirely justified.

Yes, SOME children actually do suffer and die from the actions of evil people. I run the same risk while alive just like everyone else. Howsomever, my and everyone elses' constitutional and God given rights trump statist dreams. Sad to say ... Shit happens.

Callous you say? Nowhere near as callous as some media whore (Or someone trying to score talking points.) exploiting survivors and dancing on the bodies in the name of ratings and market share ...

4. Quantity - See #1 in the above Pro section.

5. Stores - Allows for 1159 retail outlets.

Will there really be THAT many? Who cares? Oh yes! GOVERNMENT does.

6. Will flood Ohio with marijuana.

I gotz news fer ya' pal. OHIO IS ALREADY FLOODED WITH MARIJOHOONIE! It's Ohios' biggest cash crop fer cryin' out loud!

Look ... I'm all for DECRIMINALIZING weed. I'm all for repealing those stupid laws short circuiting natural selection and putting people in jail who shouldn't be there in the first place. I'm all for letting folks commit suicide with their method of choice.

But ... legalize it?

No.

From looking at Mr. Husteds' (Ohio Secretary of State) document, Issue 3 is nothing more than an attempt at a government power grab. Instead of people being left the hell alone, Issue 3 opens the floodgates to more government expansion, more and higher taxes, more curtailment of freedom and a general tightening of the governmental choke hold on everything we already have.

VOTE NO ON ISSUE THREE!

And please don't talk to me about marijuana reform being about "freedom". You're not a libertarian ... You're just a pothead!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there're a buncha articles unner' this 'un, stoned or not, yer already there.

Oh Great! ... An Endorsement ...

Oh Great! ... An Endorsement ...

I go to one of my favorite Libertarian sites, hoping to get a bit of insight into the goings on in the world from someone with more or less my point of view. And what do I see? ...

THIS!

Terrific!

Now this means I'm gonna' have to post more articles. Some even to be "written" by me. That's work!

I was really enjoying my being lax about my blog. Now I'm gonna' have to post AT LEAST once a week.

Thanks a LOT Mr. Traven!

Next week I'll be posting an article on why I'm voting AGAINST Ohios' Issue 3 (Marijuana Reform) and on SOLID Libertarian grounds.

AS for those capitalists/socialists masquerading as Libertarians ... TOO BAD FOR YOU!


Link to the above heads-up here.

Link to that despicable blog with the heads-up here.


Go to Jays Tee Vee blog main page here. If you see any articles under this 'un, with or without the heretofore mentioned Karol Traven, yer already there.

Charleston, Obama, Clinton and the Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media

Charleston, Obama, Clinton and the Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Earlier this week, a pathetic, evil individual shot and killed nine people in a church in Charleston, South Carolina.

Within hours of the shooting, while CNN and other "news" outlets went into their usual frenzy of anti firearms indignation and phony concern, President Barack Obama and Presidential candidate Hilary Clinton stepped up to the mike offering their condolences AND  exploiting the situation for their agendas and garnering votes.

The following is a reposting of an article posted by an annonymous writer on the 4chan website stating what one may expect from politicians, "social reformers", so-called mainstream media and other would-be saviors of your soul in the next few weeks:


Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Got this while perusing the 4chan website some time after the Newtown/Sandy Hook incident. As it makes more than enough sense, I'm posting it here:

I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

Remember folks, in spite of what CNN et al thinks, you have minds of your own. Use them.

Be sure to check out the pro-gun organisation links in the I Second the Motion section on the right side of this page.

Guns, Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.

4chan website here. Warning: CONTAINS CONTENT INAPPROPRIATE FOR CHILDREN.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

A Couple of Quibcags ...

A Couple of Quibcags ...


So just what exactly is a "quibcag"? Simply put: Quote Illustrated by Cute Anime Girl.

These can be found at Karol Travens' Ex-Army blog.

I fell across this blog while searching for illustrations for my Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya fanfic story, Mr. John Smith Goes To Washington. I pirated about three of them as I thought they were appropriate.

The blog itself is a Libertarian website with a racist tone to it, so if you find that objectionable, I'd advise not going there. If you can get past that, you'll find the site to be witty, insightful (And INCITEFUL!) and bitingly blunt about any subject mentioned as well as critical of the "idealistic" (And UNREALISTIC!) "unicorns and rainbows" version of Libertarianism that has been bandied about for years. You know, if everyone in the world knew about the Libertarian world view, they'd all embrace it and become good little free enterprisers. Even the folks at ISIS/ISIL/ASSHOLE would drop their Islamic silliness and go for the gusto!

Not gonna' happen.

A feature of Mr. Travens' blog is the above mentioned "quibcag", of which a couple (Somewhat related to one another.) I have illustrated below:

Mr. Traven will also quote other writers for his 'cags'.

Maybe, maybe not. If one is not careful, you
could find yourself porn surfing for the rest
of your life.

A bit of irony here. In my aforementioned fanfic wherein I used some of Mr. Travens 'cags', the three white guys in the story "hook up" with the three Asian babes of the Haruhi series ... And we all know what an aggressive little sexpot Yuki Nagato can be!

Yeah ... Right!

Hentai is NOT canon.

Just sayin' ...

Mr. Travens' Ex-Army blog here.

Mr. John Smith Goes to Washington here.

C V Fords' profile page and fanfiction story list here.

Fanfiction dot net here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there's a buncha' articles under this 'un, yer already there ... uh ... Here!

A Short Conversation With Evil

Pretty much describes liberals and liberalism.
Conservatives and conservatism not much better either.

A Short Conversation With Evil


I had a little talk with evil the other day. A person of my "aquaintance" and I had a chance discussion about various topics when the subject of internet freedom came up.

I mentioned the U.S. government/ICANN was going to hand over its' "control" of the internet to a United Nations governing body. You know the ... U.N. . That playpen of dictators, do-gooders and terrrorists operating on our dime.

As much as I DESPISE "our" government, I will say that it has pretty much had a hands off attitude in regard to free expression on the net. I mentioned this to her and stated the possibility of American websites being closed down if some foriegn "faction" or other gets its' nose out of joint because they don't like what's being said about them.

Her reply:

"Just watch what you say on the net."

I responded by saying the net is the last "frontier" of free expression  and the only thing one should fear on the net is someone demanding that one back up their statements with facts and ideas.

She concluded the discussion with her usual irrefutable, fact and idea filled, "winning" statement of arguments past:

"I don't wanna' hear it!"

This is what they say when they don't have the physical means to shut you up. Or at least when there isn't enough of them around to shout you down.

I absolutely HATE ... detest ... liberals and liberalism (Almost as much as conservatives and conservatism!). Not because they are and is but because they aren't and isn't.. How can one call oneself liberal and advocate taking away rights? They are the fascists they accuse everyone else of being. Hypocrisy becomes them.

Much to their delight, the greatest, most prosperous country ever is sinking to its' knees and into a socialist dark age. In their masochistic, self hating 'gasm' they drag us with them.

Due to their efforts, their "leaders" have delayed the consequences of their recent voting/actions thus postponing the effects of Obamacare until after the 2016 elections. Obamacare will eventually bring home the consequences of appealing to the something for nothing crowd as never before in the history of this country, and it is my fervent hope they feel it in FULL weight and measure.

They deserve what we're all gonna' get.

It will be interesting to see how they cope on part time pay due to the employer mandate keeping them from having a full time job with a single employer ... with a whopping MANDATORY monthly health insurance payment on top of it. The choice of meeting the monthly rent/mortgage OR the health insurance payment oughta' be fun.

Think about it. There are now laws on the books that will eventually prevent many from having a full time job in a single place of employment due to the employer mandate.

As for myself, if it comes to my having to do the monetary equivalent of making monthly payments on a new luxury car the rest of my life, then I'll just do without the health insurance and pay the yearly fine ... At least until the fine is more expensive than the insurance. I'd sooner pay the rent than be out on the street.

The age of low cost liberalism may be about over and the yelping from liberals, politicians and parasites may be a delight to hear. Maybe then it will hit home on enough of them to stop what they're doing and think a bit.

And no ... I'm not into "tough love" ... I'm into sadism. And these masochists will have no right to complain.

Ah! ... Schadenfreude ...

Just sayin' ...

It would be more accurate to have the liberal "wedgie" in the "Communitarian"
corner. After all, a liberal is nothing more than a communist without the courage
to kill for his beliefs.

PC World article on ICANN and internet freedom at risk here.

The Capitalism/Socialism Non-Difference here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there's a buncha' articles under this one, you're already there.

The afore-promised "anti"-Walking Dead article to appear sometime next week.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


Got this while perusing the 4chan website some time after the Newtown/Sandy Hook incident. As it makes more than enough sense, I'm posting it here:


I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

Yeah ... That's how they "think".

Remember folks, in spite of what CNN et al thinks, you have minds of your own. Use them.


Guns, Polls & Statistics: Off the Top of My Head here.

*Arm Flail* Guns! *Arm Flail* here.

When Fun Is Outlawed here.

Gun Control: It's Not "For the Children" here.

Of Dancing On the Bodies & Crocodile Tears here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

"Trials" of a Voice Actor Part 3

                                         "Trials" of a Voice Actor Part 3

                                                               by

                                                                  Jay Agan

      I get home after a particularly arduous day at work & am greeted with a message on the machine from my agent. "Get down to XYZ Studio at 10 AM for an anti-smoking radio spot. Pays 200 etc....." O.K!.

      Anti-smoking? Hmmmm. I don't mind telling folks what a dumb thing it is to smoke. No sense in hurting yourself & others. Yet .....

      I e-mail the agent inquiring wether this is a simple public service announcement or an advocacy of an anti-smoking LAW. He sends me the script.

      It was as I feared. The Dept. of Health & Human Services of a state out west wanted to innaugurate the activation of a new LAW voted in by the state legislature a year before. The law affected private businesses (Bars, restaraunts, etc.). The ad agency doing the ad thought my voice perfect for it. Wrong!

      As a small L libertarian I believe one has the right to kill oneself as fast or slow as desired as long as no one else is harmed. The government has no right to declare private businesses/property to be public places (If you can't stand the smoke/heat, get the heck out of the bar/kitchen!).

      I e-mailed the agent & declined, giving my reasons.

      I could have used the 200 bucks (less agents' 20%.). I could have used the exposure (My voice would have been heard all over the state extolling Big Brother.). To heck with it. There are some things I won't do for money.

      About a month later, around contract renewal time, I get an e-mail from the agent informing me that due to the bad economy, they were dropping me & others from their roster.

      I would like to thank all the well meaning politicians from both parties for helping to make my life less than it could be. It is because of their well intentioned efforts that I & many others have had to put our dreams on hold. Again, thank you. Now go "help" someone else. Like Libya for instance.

                                         Article copyright © 4-5-2011 Jay Agan

Go to Main Page here.

This article may be copied in whole or in part. Please cite proper credit & backlink.