The Butt Shot of Haruhi Suzumiya

Object in view may be larger than it appears. Open in new tab
for a "better" look. Possibly the best part of Endless Eight.

The Butt Shot of Haruhi Suzumiya


First a disclaimer:

No, I'm not getting this blog into ecchi or cheesecake and certainly not porn/hentai.

This is an experiment.

What I'm attempting is to see how effective renaming an illustration can be in aquiring blog hits.

Example:

When one is looking for a particular illustration, does he go to a search engine and enter 123xyz.jpg? Of course not. What he enters is what he's looking for. Character or actor name, title, scene description, and any other particulars he has in mind. If what he's looking for is named 123xyz.jpg, there's a good chance it's not going to come up and you'll be less one hit on your blog.

I rename any illustrations on this blog with as many particulars as possible so as to lead seekers here. As an example, right click any of  this articles' illustrations and open in new tab. You'll notice the "names" to be quite long. While this probably mainly attracts "picture snatchers" it: A. Gets me one more blog hit closer to the "head of the line" on search engines. A hit is a hit after all. And B. If at least one out of every ten seekers bothers to read the article the image is with then it's done its job.

Oh yes. I also load up a blog post with as many relevant labels as possible.

An "animated" gif for you.

As an aside, I chuckle every time I try to "snatch" a picture somewhere else and a "warning" pops up condemning me as a "leacher" or some such. Kind of makes me wonder how HE got the image in the first place. Maybe it just happened to appear in his downloads file for no particular reason. Suuuuuure ...

As we all know, sex "sells". Certainly in anime and as any anime fan knows, the Haruhi Suzumiya character is still a hot property even though the show has ceased airing several years now. I thought that in using this particular illustration from the show, I can get a good idea of how effective the renaming of a picture can be.

HEY! ... Watchu' lookin' at!?!

I got the image at the top of this article from the website konachan.com. It's a booru type website that specializes in anime "wallpapers". As few people make wallpapers out of hentai, the site has comparitively little porn on it and what there is, is of a more "tasteful" kind. The site has a "safe mode" option if you want to avoid that sort of thing.

Again, I'm not trying to break into the porn field. I'm sure there are a LOT of folks out there who can do it so much "better" than I.


The Head Trip of Haruhi Suzumiya 1, 2 and 3.

Wikipedia article on The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya here.

The Endless Eight of Haruhi Suzumiya: C'mon! It Wasn't THAT Bad here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If there's a buncha' articles under this 'un, you're already there.

18 U.S.C. 2257 1/2, C.F.R., Rule 34 Compliance Notice & Disclaimer

18 U.S.C. 2257 1/2, C.F.R., Rule 34 compliance notice & disclaimer.

All models (Plastic, silicon, etc. Cement & paint not included.), "actors"/"actresses", farm animals, humanoids, reasonable facsimiles thereof and other persons/mutants that appear in any visual depiction of actual or simulated sexual misconduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at, were over the age of eighteen (18) years or at least looked like it at the time of the creation of such depictions, or the procurers at least waited until they were eighteen (18) years of age before releasing said depictions.

Some of the aforementioned depictions appearing or otherwise contained in or at, contain only visual depictions of actual sexually explicit misconduct made before July 3, 1895, and, as such, are exempt from the requirements set forth in 18 U.S.C. 2257 1/2, C.F.R. 75 & Rule 34. However, anything with Traci Lords appearing is subject to immediate review. With regard to the remaining depictions of actual sexual misconduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at, the bogus records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2257 1/2, C.F.R. 75, & Rule 34 are kept by one of the custodian of records listed below (If we find him/her/it we'll let you know.).

In fulfilling its obligations under Section 2257 1/2, relies on the plainly vague language of the statute and on the well-reasoned decision of the Tenth U.S. Short Circuit Court of Appeals in Sundance over a few drinks, which states that entities who merely distribute content and have no role in procuring models (Why did they have to change the formula of the glue!?) or producing content, are exempt from on-site bogus record keeping requirements.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.