Fake Polls Are Fake Polls

Go to Jaysteevee blog main page here. Any articles under this one means you're already there.

My Take On Last November

Hillary Clinton and John Podesta plot campaign strategy.
Photo credit: Metro Goldwyn Meyer

My Take On Last November


This diatribe is off the top 'o my head. I'm not going to use "facts 'n figures", etc.. This is only a retelling of how I experienced last Novembers' miracle.

How the heck did Trumpus Maximus win!? ... But then, how did Clinton lose?

1. From the start, Clinton had a LOT of baggage going in. Folks already had a gut full of her co-presidency of the '90s and the accompanying fireworks of which she was NOT the wide eyed innocent. Her stint as Secretary of State during the Obama regime didn't sit well with a lot of folks either. The Benghazi affair, deleted emails, "What difference does it make?"/evasiveness and doing private business on the companys' time and dime. There was no way she could get out from under such an interesting past.

The negatives Mr. Trump had ...

"GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY! GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY! EEK! EEK! EEK! EEK! HE SAID GRAB 'ER BY THE PUSSY!"

Man, if that's the worst they could come up with ...

Yeah there were other personal negatives on him, ranging from his personal life, business dealings, tax matters and his blunt manner (Actually a plus!) but they seemed trivial compared to Clintons' "trail of bodies".

The lefts' referring to him and his supporters as fascist, nazi, racist and whateveraphobes really had little effect. Such terms have now pretty much lost their meaning except "I hate you because you disagree with me". These idiots wouldn't know what fascism was (The means of production being privately owned but dictated to by the state.) if Mussolini himself kicked them in the nuts.

And they wouldn't know what racism was (The inner feeling and outward expression of support and unity with those of ones' own race.) if I bit them on the ass.

2. Clintons' communication problems didn't help her either.

A. She didn't really to like talking to people. Didn't like answering questions. Press conferences (Except toward the end.) she avoided as much as possible.

Mr. Trump LOVES to talk. Press conferences, arranged or on the spot, he'd jump right in.

Clinton would give a speech, disappear for awhile, have a rally, disappear awhile ...

Trump was all over the place! Seemingly in more than one place at a time. At least three speeches/rallies a day. He was out hustling, selling the product.

B. While both had FUCK YOU attitudes, Mr. Trump was at least saying FU to the right people such as the Democrat Party, Wall Streeters, elitists, left media, the Republican Party (This endeared him to a LOT of disaffected republicans.) and coprophages like the failed Manchurian candidate, John McCain.

Clinton, on the other hand, FUed the wrong people.

You DON'T go to the heart of coal country saying you're "going to put coal miners and coal companies out of business". What that said to a LOT of folks was she was going to keep/put them out of work. Condescendingly saying how important the environment was but you're going to have them working in "green industries" somewhere down the road (Maybe ... perhaps ... might ... If ever I get around to it ...) doesn't help either. While it certainly was a nicer way of telling all those working stiffs to go to hell, it didn't help her campaign any.

Pennsylvania and West Virginia went red as a consequence.

You don't say (In regard to Trumps' MAGA slogan.) America is already great and that's why you'll continue the policies of the previous administration. Lots of folks already had a heaping helping of that the past eight years. They weren't looking for another four plus.

You don't go calling your opponents supporters "a basket full of deplorables" (Thus giving a new slogan to the other side!). A large number of folks who were sympathetic but hesitant about Trump before, got knocked off the fence and into MAGA over that one. Backtracking and saying you only meant half of your opponents supporters came too lame and too late. Both halves and then some thought you were talking about them.

C. Using the old tried and true method of the "capitol hill shill" (Used in the past by politicos from both sides of the aisle.), Clinton speechified, seemingly more to "groups" and special interests, about how she was right and her opponent wrong using long winded diatribes and at times talking over every ones' heads.

Trumps' style was definitely atypical. He'd directly address peoples problems and made it seem like he was talking personally to working people. "YOU ... are worried about your family, the future of YOUr children. YOU're concerned about safety, national security, terrorism. YOUr job, pay check, taxes, take home, etc.".

The style was simple, direct and ... repetitive. Saying the same things over and over.

This drove both left and right nuts. Not realizing that Mr. Trump was NOT campaigning. He was advertising. Carefully listen to a typical thirty to sixty second radio/TV ad and note how many times the product/solution they're selling is mentioned by name.

I also found his hand gestures and facial expressions interesting. While folks listened with their ears, their eyes were focused on hands and face thus making it easier for the message to register in their minds. I don't know if Mr. Trump was consciously using this "hypnotism" or not but it was fascinating as well as effective.

Trump could be hypnotic whereas Clinton would bore or put people to sleep ... except when she was doing her more than excellent Margaret Hamilton impersonation ("I'll GET you my pretty ... AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOTO TOO!").

3. Crowd sizes:

CNN (Commie News Net) and other propaganda outlets assured us that crowd size at speeches and rallies were no factor in determining the elections' outcome. They correctly cited that Mitt Romney drew larger crowds than Obama in 2012 but still lost.

Howsomever ...

Romney had nowhere near the crowd sizes that Mr. Trump had and Ms. Clintons' were nowhere near that of Obamas'.

In the interest of "fairness", PMSNBC and other alt left media would not turn the cameras around on the crowds. I had a better picture of how things were from alternate print and vid sources on the net. You know ... the "nazis" at Brietbart, the "conspiracy mongers" at Infowars, that "fascist" Drudgereport and all those You Tube "anarchists". They would turn the cameras around.

I'd never seen anything before like it! While Clinton had trouble putting butts in seats at high school auditoriums, Trump had no trouble at all getting OVERFLOW crowds at stadiums and airline hangers. Yeah ... Those huge buildings they park jumbo jets in to get serviced.

The photos of "huddled masses" in front of auditorium stages at Clinton "rallies" were sad and pathetic. Sometimes the combination of the numbers of her paid entourage and the media locusts would rival that of her supporters. The cancelled rally in Florida where Kaine, her running mate was to speak ... Only EIGHT people showed up.

Trump spoke at noon one day at the county fairgrounds in my area. They were turning people away at 10:30 AM.

All through the campaign, media mouth(y)pieces kept declaring that crowd size doesn't translate into votes.

Large numbers of people don't drive for miles/hours to hear someone speak in the full knowledge of a one in four chance they'd be turned away ... and not vote.

4. Wikileaks:

No matter who "hacked" the DNC and others the fact of the matter is that what was in those E-mails was true.

A. Collusion of the Dems and the media to pump Clinton at the expense of Trump.

Dems SHOULD be mad ... but not at Trump. The meat puppets had the rank and file absolutely convinced of Clintons' inevitability. THEY had them believing the throne had already been set up in the White House and the crown and ruby slippers all shined and ready.

So much so, some of them stayed home on election day thinking their votes weren't needed. A lot of them now are out there smashing windows and being the useless little punks they are. So how the hell does that help?

B. Manipulation of the polls:

I read articles about the pollsters oversampling of Dems in order to "weight" their results. I only consulted two polls, LA Times/USC (With its interesting criteria.) which had the two neck and neck and sometimes Rasmussen. The fact the pollsters couldn't reliably gauge the influence and number of "new voters" (Some of whom hadn't voted since the Reagan era!) also had me wondering.

C. The screwing of Bernie Sanders in the primary run:

Yes, there was a "never Trump" movement. What is less well known was the "never Hillary" faction.

Whereas the the anti-Trumpers were party "higher ups"/officials and hacks the anti-Hillary bunch were from the Dem rank and file, many pulling for Sanders.
Clintons' trust issues made many skepticle. The leaks only intensified that. When Sanders lost the nomination a large number ended up voting third party or even Trump (Who said some of the same things about Wall Street as Sanders.).

Sanders "drinking the Kool-Aid" (Jimmy Jones Party Punch!) and backing Clinton made him seem like just another shill to many who then lost faith in the Dem party.

5. The debates:

Of course the alt left "lugenpresse" said Clinton walked away with all three. Bull!

A. The first one had Trump holding his own.

B. As for the second one ...

History has shown the conservative candidate will lose the election if he does not have the support of two groups: Gun Owners and Evangelicals.

Mr. Trump had the gun owners solidly behind him long before the second debate. The National Rifle Association endorsed him BEFORE the Republican National Convention (With Romney, it wasn't until October!) and the rest weren't far behind.

The evangelicals were pretty much with Trump by then but there were still quite a few fence sitters in that quarter. Mr. Trumps' forceful stating of his positions on and Ms. Clintons' rather callous answers to the question about late term and partial birth abortion knocked them right OFF the fence and cemented that faction in the Trump camp.

The "bitter clingers" won big that November.

C. In the third debate, on being asked by Chris Wallace about the deleted E-mails from her stint as Secretary of State, she clumsily ducked the question and wouldn't answer. This didn't sit well with those watching.

6. Enthusiasm:

I've worked at the same place, a university, for the past ten years. This college is no exception when it comes to places of higher learning being hotbeds of indoctrination into the wonders and glories of leftist non-wisdom and bullshit.

The place is covered in "rainbow safe zone" stickers. So it should come as no surprise that the support for Obama was through the roof there.

In both 2008 and 2012 elections, the enthusiasm for that socialist asshole was incredible.

"OOOOOO! ... Our first black president!"

Faculty 'n fools couldn't get enough of him. Posters, get out the vote drives, rallies, etc.. Young  Democrats and other subversive on-campus organisations reserving conference rooms and lounges for meetings and watching the debates.

You get the idea.

2016 ... Nothing.

No, "OOOOOO ... Our first WOMYN president!"

The campus was pretty quiet. Sure, the odd student would make some snide comment about Mr. Trump at the lobby TV now and then and that's about it.

Shoot! Just the other day a fine upstanding "sexual non-conformist", fresh out of viewing a weekly film at the "Queer Film Fest" series in one of the auditoriums shouted a hearty FU! at Fox coverage of Mr. Trumps' recent rally in Pennsyltucky.

During the campaign there was evidence of they and Ms. Clinton being against something. But not really being FOR anything ... Except maybe the "same old, same old" of the past eight years.

Aside from a sign in the lobby on election day offering rides to polling places, I didn't see ANY activity.

I couldn't help but feel Clinton may be having trouble.

7. Last days of the campaign:

A. Whether or not Comeys' letters to Congress about additional Clinton/State Dept. E-mails influenced the election he knew he was going to be accused of supporting one candidate or the other no matter when he announced them. My guess is he decided to avoid criticism of not having announced as soon as he could instead of later. In my view he was only doing CYA and not because it was in support of Trump.

B. Clinton kept doing her comparatively sporadic speechifying (Though she did step up her frequency of press conferences.) while Mr. Trump, as usual, was continually on the hustle and getting his word out.

The weekend before election day Mr. Trump went to all the battleground states and then some. He looked like he wanted to win this one. Maybe it's just me but
Clinton hardly seemed to be mentioned much. Don't you want to win this one, lady?

C. The Wednesday before election day, it was announced the Clinton campaign cancelled the fireworks display that was to happen in the event of a Clinton victory. Did someone in her group know something we didn't?

D. Thursday before election day, a Drudge Report link led me to a You Tube presentation wherein a young lady mentioned that the Clinton campaign was withdrawing people and resources from the battleground states of Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.

Was the campaign staff that confident (Arrogant?) that they didn't need to put that much effort in those important states?

It seems to have been the case considering Ms. Clintons' behavior late November Eight/early November Nine. After finding she was losing, she was in no mental shape to deliver a concession speech and did so much later that morning.

8. Election day:

I wake up, sweating bullets. Usual net reading no comfort at all.

Go in to work in the afternoon (nite shift). Nothing going to happen 'til about eight o'clock. Still sweating.

After eight, Clinton grabs an early lead. Northwest reporting in. Clinton grabs New York, pundits crow about Trump losing his home state (Leaving out the fact his "other" home state, Florida was yet to be counted.).

Of course New York went to Clinton. Fully expected that. No conservative has gotten NY in a looooong time.

About an hour later I glance at the lobby screen. Trump in a small lead that got bigger later which he maintained the rest of the night.

I go home at midnite thirty by which Mr. Trumps' lead was looking pretty good. Michigan, Pennsy and others still close.

I get on Fox streaming and Stormfront.

Yes, THAT Stormfront (Nazis! ... And KluKKers! ... And trolls! ... OH MY!)!

Seems a really hot thread in the Newslinks and Articles section was really going at it. They were practically in "chatroom" mode considering how quick the responses were coming in. Even the Trump haters were rooting for Trump!

So  ... Switching between the two, sweating out the results ...

Let's go Pennsylvania ... Trump leading ... not by much ... but ... he ... just might ...

Michigan looks even narrower. C'moooon Michigan! Go Wolverines!

Yeah, like I care. I'm supposed to be for the OSU Buckeyes but I never gave a dang about them either.

Still switching back and forth awhile. Notice some new entries on the Stormfront thread. Third to the last one:

"AP and Russian News have just declared for Trump. Wooo Hooo!"

Russian News? RT?

Going back to Fox, they're still waffling about the vote. Wallace and company commenting on the stillness of the Clinton NY headquarters and the exuberance at Trumps'. After about ten, fifteen minutes Fox finally gives it to Trump.

I never thought I'd see the day when Fox gets scooped by "Russian News".

9: Conclusion:

Keep in mind, this article is off the top'o my head. If things seem a little sketchy and inexact it's because of the time since and this is only from where I sat through the whole thing.

Right now, Mr. Trump is going through some rocky times, what with the incredible butt hurt the Dems are still going through. Along with the never-
Trumping whinos 'n RINOS like McCain, et al ...

Well ... With Republicans like these ... Who needs Democrats?

Keep in mind, Mr. Trump isn't this all powerful wizard casting spells to instantly make things better. He's only one man and the krap ain't over yet.

So let's get ready for 2018 and 2020. Volunteer, get involved and VOTE!

Jus' sayin ...


Note: My apologies to Margaret Hamilton (The 'Wicked Witch of the West" in The Wizard of Oz. MGM, 1939.) for use of the title photo. She was a GREAT actress!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Ifn' ya sees articles under this 'un already, then yer already there ... MAGA!

THANK GOD FOR MOTHER RUSSIA!

Those who've seen the Hetalia anime get the joke.
credit: awesomeariel

THANK GOD FOR MOTHER RUSSIA!


First ... I believe that any hacking into private computer e-mails, data bases, etc. to be unethical. As a "small L" libertarian I believe privacy sacred. If the Russians did "hack" into the e-mails of the DNC and others to influence the election then what they did was wrong ... period.

But ...

I still can't shake the feeling of relief I have over how the election turned out. I can't help but feel good about what was revealed in those e-mails may have helped in keeping that vile creature from gaining the presidency regardless of possible Russian involvement.

So ...

Were the Russians involved? Maybe ... Maybe not. Yes, the malicious codes used by the Russians in the past were used in this. However, these codes have been found by "white hat" hackers and posted out on the net for all the world to see for several years now. Anyone savvy enough to use them could and SOMEONE obviously did.

Other than that, there's not much in the way of evidence presented to show that the Russkies did it.

But if so ...

Thank God for Mother Russia!

At least this time.

And ...

Wether the Russ were involved or not doesn't mitigate the fact that what was revealed on those hacked e-mails ARE true.

They show the correspondence of DNC members on:

1. Collusion with (fake) news media organizations in supporting Clinton. "It's not fake if WE manipulate, play up or even make it up!"

2. How the DNC was screwing Bernie Sanders during primary season. Trotsky loses again!

3. How various polling organizations would manipulate data in supporting Clinton.

4. Donna Brazile giving Clinton "heads up" on some debate questions that would be asked during the primary season.

Does my being happy of alleged Russian involvement in the election make me a cynical hypocrite in light of my opposition to hacking for any reason?

Yeah ...

But hey ... The left does "the same thing".

Whatever it is, if we do it, it's wrong, evil, racist, dirty, etc. When they do it, it's "social justice".

Its ...

"Friends on the left, none on the right."

And ...

"It's not fascism if the right people are doing it."

The left has taught us well if we'd only learn from it.

To the left in general I say: Yes ... I'm just as hypocritical and rotten as you are.

But you're no where near as happy as I am right now.

Jus' sayin' ...

Lesson learned: Don't grab the handle on your way out!

"Evidence" of more hacking by those vile Russkies here. Turns out to be a LEEEEETLE different from what that paragon of journalism, THE WASHINGTON POST, says it is.

El Donaldos' New Years' greetings here and here (Second link mostly about Russ hacking.).  All hail TRUMPUS MAXIMUS. Yea verily!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. You haven't been hacked if ya' sees articles under this 'un already. It just means yer already there.

ALL HAIL TRUMPUS MAXIMUS!

ALL HAIL TRUMPUS MAXIMUS!


Saw a couple quibcags (quote introduced by cute anime girl) on the Ex-Army blog 'n thought I'd add my two cents.

Of course we know how the presidential election itself went and the above "cag" pretty much says it all. The hive mind that calls itself the Democratic Party and has a jackasshole as it's symbol, worked very hard to get that haridan elected.

For the last eight years, it had been building up to what they thought was a sure thing.

You may recall it starting out as "eight years Obama, eight years Hillary" (These jerks were so DAMN confident the second four would go to her as well!). Then it was "I'm ready for Hillary!" They had all but crowned that she-orc as the Empress of the Universe.

There was NO WAY she could lose. We might as well have just skipped the election and made it official by coronating her.

Why?

Because the pundits SAID SO, that's why!

Happy for us all, what they thought to be the joker in the deck turned out not to be a jack but the ace of diamonds.

I laughed my posterior off over this one!

As I'm a Lovecraft fan and actually work at a university (There's all these safe space/zone, rainbow crap stickers/signs all over the place.), I thought I'd throw in the above quibcag as well.

This is my last blog post for this year. Hope you had a GREAT Christmas. I know I did. The election was more than just "gravy on the rice".

Have a safe, happy and prosperous new year ...


The strange place from where I copped the above graphics here.

A couple of my Star Trek articles here 'n here.

Some of my Lovecraft movie reviews here, here and ... here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Yer already there if you espy articles beneath this 'un h'yar.

Dear Leftists, Liberals, and Progressives

Cobbed this from Armands' Rancho Del Cielo blog who in turn:


The following was posted today by John Paul Straub at The Deplorables Facebook page:


Dear Leftists, Liberals, and Progressives,

You lost this election because you got up every day and loudly accused anyone who didn't agree with you of being a racist, misogynist, bigot, homophobic.

You lost because you did nothing but spew hate for 8 years while telling us yours was an ideology of love.

You lost because you stole from America via taxation while telling us that we were the greedy ones.

You lost because you dropped more bombs, killed more with drone strikes, and increased tensions with a nuclear superpower all while telling us that we were the war-mongers.

You lost because the cities that you controlled spiraled into poverty and crime all while you told us that our policies disenfranchised people.

You lost because you told us that gender is simply a social construct all while telling us that Hillary should be president because of her gender.

You lost because you support and take money from regimes that imprison or kill gays, subjugate women, and think that rape is a man's right all while telling us that we hate gays, are afraid of women, and promote a culture of rape.

You did not lose because we are racist. You did not lose because we are homophobic.

You did not lose because we are misogynists or bigots.

You lost because you are liars. You lost because you are hypocrites. You lost because you were not witty or clever enough to even hide those facts very well.

Sincerely,

The Rest of America

What I THINK is The Deplorables facebook addy here. If not, it oughta' be. Has some GREAT funny pro-Trump illustrations! Two of which I swiped for this article.

Armands' Rancho del Cielo, where I got wind of this article here. Mr. Vaquer is the unofficial U.S. Ambassador to Japan ... At least I think he is.

Here is probably the most iconic "snowflake meltdown" ever. She looks like a real killer tomato!

A very calm pro-Trump reaction to the election here ... NOT!


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. You're already there if you see other articles under this 'un.

Attention Christians ... VOTE TRUMP!

Attention Christians ... VOTE TRUMP!


Awhile back, I ran into a fellow believer who said he couldn't vote for Donald Trump because "he's not a man of God". In fact, he wasn't going to vote at all!

Of course I have no patience with an attitude like that and told him so. Anyone not getting involved in the political process is a drag on society and has NO right in complaining afterwards about the sad state of affairs that may come about after the wrong people take office and implement their plans to save us from ourselves.

That sad state of affairs WILL take place if too many people "sit it out" on election day and allow Hillary Clinton to become president.

There is NO excuse for not voting.

And certainly, Donald Trump is not that excuse.

Yes ...

He's rude. He's crude. He's not all that polished. He may have a past not in liking to the more genteel among us.

HE IS NOT A POLITICIAN and has little skill in soothing "itching ears".  (2nd Timothy 4:3)

What he is is a hard headed businessman with much experience. Not only in business but in his handling of politicians, unions and other "factions" over the years in order to conduct it. He knows how they think and act.

A good illustration can be seen from this contrasting scene from the comedy film, Back To School, starring Rodney Dangerfield.

He will conduct the business of the executive branch on sound business principals:

Don't spend more than what you have, make or take. Otherwise if your outgo is greater than your income, then your upkeep will be your downfall.

"Oh!" You say. "He's not a Christian! He's not a man of God!"

Not a man of God. Well ... If you've read your bible, you know God in some way has made use of the likes of womanizers, prostitutes, politicians, tax collectors and even dictators to further his kingdom on earth and protect believers. The likes of Sampson, Matthew, Nebuchanezor, King David, Rahab, Mary Magdalene come to mind. Their credentials as saints weren't exactly the greatest.

Many other Biblical figures had led less than perfect lives.

And the same goes for Donald Trump.

Even YOU are not exactly the "man of God" you'd like to be. So what makes you think it's beneath you to vote for Mr. Trump?

Even though Mr. Trump is certainly less than perfect (Just like you! Or me for that matter.), unlike his opponent, his political platform upholds many of the things you believe in (Examples are he's pro-life and pro-Christian liberties.).

Don't think of him as the "lesser of two evils". Rather he's the better of the two candidates.

That much is obvious in comparing the two platforms/agendas.

Over the years I have heard "big talk" coming from various folks in the right wing and Christian circles. Stuff like, "if they come for my guns, I'll shoot 'em!" or "my faith is strong, I'll withstand it."

Or even worse ... "I don't have to worry for I'll be taken up in the rapture."

Putting aside any debate over "the rapture", you don't know when Revelations' prophecies will start. People the world over are going through hell on earth right now for various reasons. Just try telling them they're not going through "tribulation".

History has shown all sorts of horrendous periods and places of trials and persecution over the centuries. More than likely a possible Clinton presidency would continue AND RADICALLY INTENSIFY the situation Mr. Obama and the left has already put us in and not be an ushering in of Tim LaHayes' apocalyptic fantasies.

Your vote for Donald Trump, for the moment, is something that you can do NOW to prevent what may be a socialist dark age and the radical curtailment of the practice of your Christian faith.

Forget the "big talk" and faith/rapture fantasies.

If you're a coward with your vote now ...

You'll be a coward with Jesus (And your guns.) later.

Jus' sayin' ...

Donald Trump for President here.

Republican Party here.

Ohio Republican Party here.

Citizens for Community Values here.

Where Is the Church In this Presidential election? here.

An Encounter With Evil here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there.

Donald Trumps' 8-Point Plan for His First 100 Days In Office

Donald Trumps' 8-Point Plan for His First 100 Days In Office


As soon as I enter the White House on January 20, 2017, I will begin implementing my 8-Point Plan for the first 100 days of the Trump Administration.

Here is what we will do:

1. On Day One, we will roll out our plan to BUILD THE WALL, send criminal illegal immigrants home and finally end the open borders nightmare.

2. Begin renegotiating ALL unfair trade deals like NAFTA which have undercut American employment and exported our prosperity.

3. CANCEL all executive orders, bureaucratic rules and crippling regulations that send American jobs overseas.

4. Work with Congress to REPEAL and replace the disastrous ObamaCare legislation that is ruining American healthcare.

5. Lift the radical Obama regulations on Americas' energy industry to END our dependence on foreign energy sources and create new jobs here at home.

6. Propose, pass and sign into law a massive TAX CUT for all working Americans and unleash the jobs-creating power of our small businesses.

7. NOMINATE Surpreme Court Justices who will uphold the Constitution and not legislate the liberal agenda from the bench and ...

8. IMPOSE strict new ethics rules to restore the integrity of the Office of the Secretary of State.


Vote for Donald Trump and these plans for his First 100 Days ... Imagine what can be done with a non corrupt President who actually cares about America as opposed to hates America (Barack Obama) and Hillary Clinton who only loves herself, her donors and Power!

A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for America.

Any vote not for Trump, third party or not at all, is a vote for Clinton.

Donald Trump for President here.

Vote for Trump Anyway here.

Two Votes for Hillary here.

Can't Afford Obama, Can't Afford Clinton here.

Republican Party here.

Ohio Republican Party here.



Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this one means you're already there.

Vote for Trump Anyway!

Vote for Trump Anyway!


So it seems Mr. Trump might be a scoundrel ... Very well.

For the sake of argument, let us assume the allegations are true.

As it is it may seem even harder for some to vote for him.

Some may ask how one could vote for such a person.

Actually the choice is still very simple and easy.

One thing the Left has taught me over the years is that no matter how execrable any of their office holders or candidates are, the Left will defend and vote for them. If they want their people in charge and forward their agenda, the Left will support them no mattter what.

For the Left, ideology is more important than personality.

We must follow the lefts' example and vote for Mr. Trump to win this election.

So ... Assuming that the allegations of sexual misconduct of 20+ years ago are true ...

On one side we have a pig, Mr. Trump.

On the other, we have another pigs' very corrupt, socialist enabler, Hillary Clinton.

Since the pigs' platform is more in line with our political beliefs, I will vote for the pig.

Simple enough, works for me.

Remember ... With the Left and the Democrats, ideology TRUMPS personality.

We must do the same.

Much is at stake in this election.

So much so that if Clinton is elected it could mean the end of this country, not only in its' present form but maybe not in any form at all.

That is to say:

The message to the rest of the Third World already is that the United States is a great place to be poor in, everyone is welcome and American working folks will be more than happy (!?) to foot the bill.

The Third World, urged on by our politicians and their allies in the media, is already flooding in. If elected, Clinton will continue the Obama policies of non-enforcement of our immigration laws and the flood will soon become a torrent.

On top of that, without any means of vetting, Clinton will allow in a hoard of Muslims, many of whom are affiliated with terrorist groups.

Within ten to fifteen years, this country will look, sound and SMELL like the Third World because it will be part of the Third World.

Then there is our federal judicial system which is already heavily seeded with creatures like Obama and Clinton. Judges who look upon our Constitution as only so many suggestions at best or as outmoded and to be disregarded.

These judges on the left look upon words as sliding scale non-concepts that can mean anything, thus the Constitution can be made to say anything to fit the situation or their agenda of the moment.

Until recently a conservative leaning Supreme Court has been the last legal line of defense of our individual rights as guaranteed by the Constitution. Right now it is evenly divided with a vacant seat to be filled by the next President and a rubber stamp Congress.

If  Hillary Clinton is elected, she and that rubber stamp Congress (Republican or Democrat.) will appoint a creature like themselves to that vacant Supreme Court post.

It will then be only a short matter of time that you can kiss your rights goodbye.

Your rights to speak out, express yourself in voice, print and belief. Access to information. The means of self defense and to worship. The right to be involved in the political process. These will eventually be sharply reduced.

The only right you will eventually have will be the "right" to obey whatever new laws they deem necessary or go to jail.

We will not have a rule of laws let alone of men, but a rule of chaos.

One has to be pragmatic, and throw aside ones' feelings about the personal life of Donald Trump. The consequences of a Clinton presidency far out-weigh Mr. Trumps' ALLEGED past heavy handed indiscretions.

Face it, if Hillary Clinton was any worse than she is now (And she could be.) the Left and most Democrats would STILL vote for her. We must do the same for Mr. Trump.

Too much of the above is riding on it.

Donald Trump for President here.

Republican Party here.

Ohio Republican Party here.

Ex-Army blog (Where I got the above illustration.) here.

Two Votes for Hillary here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Can't Afford Obama, Can't Afford Clinton

Can't Afford Obama, Can't Afford Clinton


Well ... I guess I'm now expected to hypocritically wring my hands over things someone said ELEVEN YEARS AGO IN A PRIVATE CONVERSATION. The kind of things I myself say when women aren't around. I don't think so.

I'm also known to tell guys to "tone it down" when ladies are about.

And that's the point. No women were around when Mr. Trump said those things. He's a lot more polite than you think.

I could say Mr. Trump was a Democrat when he said those things but that would be ridiculous. The truth is that all men are pigs and should constantly be apologizing to the ends of their days and beyond ... NOT.

Meanwhile a slew of GOP beta males have withdrawn their support of Mr. Trump.

Among whom are:

Rep. Paul Ryan - Cuck, cuck, cuck, cuck, cuck-servative.

Gov. John Kasich - I haven't voted for you since your betrayal of gun owners in back in '92 over the "assault weapon" ban.

Sen. Rob Portman - You DO want to win this election ... Don't you? Maybe not ...

Sen. Kelly Ayotte - Yeah she's not a guy but beta in every other way. While you're writing in Mike Pence as a vote instead of hitting the button/lever for Mr. Trump, that in no way goes out as a vote against Clinton ... And Hillary thanks you from the bottom of her heart. Providing of course she has one ... Or you for that matter.

xxxxx

I would however caution those who support Mr. Trump that you NOT with-hold your vote from Republican congressional candidates who have stopped supporting him. Do you really want the little socialist horrors running against them to be in office?

A bunch of wishy washy Republicans in Congress are far better than pimping Democrats.

Yeah, I know, not by much but hey ... You gotta' work with what you get and you REALLY don't want to get Democrats. I know I don't!

xxxxx

While there are political reasons I'm hitting the button for Mr. Trump, I also have personal ones:

I had a new career just starting in 2009. I had to hang that dream up, one of the reasons being the worsening economy. Yeah, Bush the Second may have started that but his successor doubled/tripled down on it. Thank you Obama and friends.

My (Now mandatory.) health insurance increased fifty dollars a month. That's 600 dollars a year. I downgraded to the Bronze plan that now costs more than what the Silver plan did at the old price.

My IRA is about ten grand less than what it should be. It took a 3000 dollar hit from last year alone.

The yearly interest on my bank account isn't enough to buy a Happy Meal.

Can't afford Obama.

Can't afford Clinton.

VOTE TRUMP!

Donald Trump for President here.

Republican Party website here.

Ohio Republican Party website here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this one means you're already there.

Bush the First to Vote for Clinton ... Big Surprise

CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK! CUCK-servative.

Bush the First to Vote for Clinton ... Big Surprise


Well ... There goes the election ... Looks like this is it ... The end of El Donaldo.

Now that it's rumored George Herbert Walker Bushed, aka: Mr. "Read my lips no new taxes" and Loser of '92 (Helped in part by Ross Perrot who also helped Bob Dull become Loser of '96. BOTH to Billys' willy!) is rumored to be voting for the goblin, it looks like it's curtains for Mr. Trump.

Yessir! The fact that a prominent member of the Republicrat/Demican elite, aka: the Shove It Up Yer Ass Sideways Brush End First With A Twist Party would vote for Hilarity Clinton should convince all those working people and other "deplorables" to do the same.

Pack it in Don ...

IT'S OVER!

Jus' sayin ...


Donald Trump For President here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there as well as deplorable.

I'm Deplorable, You're Deplorable

I'm Deplorable, You're Deplorable


A couple of graphics I got off the London Daily Mail site. At a Trump rally in Florida, the Hildebeasts' "deplorable" comment got co-opted along with the music from the Broadway hit, Les Miserables.

Yes ... I'm a basketcase deplorable. I used to be a bitter clinger but now I'm just downright DEPLORABLE.

Yes ... Utterly deplorable.

As for you Ms. Clinton, in the words of that wise sage, Daffy Duck:

"You'rrrrrrrre! ... DESTHPICABLE!


Donald Trump for President here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already deplorably there. Despicably so!

An Encounter With Evil

An Encounter With Evil


Place: Bible study at a friends' house.

Had an encounter with evil last night. Not the active, predatory kind that breeds criminals and dictators but the kind brought on by cowardice and by faux self righteousness ... The kind where one takes pride in their non-involvement because one thinks one is "above it all" ... Where one won't get their hands dirty as they feel they would somehow be sullied inside for having done so.

The kind where even greater evil is given an easy time because of it.

This ... person ... declared he was not going to vote for Donald Trump. His "excuses" were Mr. Trumps' verbal gaffes and get this ... "That he isn't a man of God".

I and another tried to get through to him, in so many words, that Jesus wasn't running for president and that it would be impossible to find the perfect candidate and that such a contender doesn't exist.

He was adamant and insisted he wasn't going to vote for Mr. Trump.

At the moment I was under the impression he was going to vote third party and kept trying to tell him that a vote against Clinton was in effect a vote FOR Clinton.

It was later he revealed later in the meeting he probably wasn't going to vote at all. More on that later.

The owner of the house intervened and said politely for all of us calm down or we would have to leave. We all were trying to talk over one another and getting nowhere.

I blame myself. Not for having "stood up" but for in not having realized I had let myself get inadvertently dragged into a needless argument.

Never get into an argument with someone like that. He will take you down to his level and beat you with experience.

The bible study continued for a little longer then went back to discussion. The guy then brought up the subject again only this time, at the homeowners' advice, kept a level tone.

It was then he stated he probably wasn't going to vote at all.

The others looked at me and I stated:

"I consider the opinion of one who will not vote as invalid ... case closed."

In other words ... If you don't vote, you have NO right to complain or even speak about it.

He wasn't happy with that.

I ignored him for the rest of the meeting and left early.

I have encountered people like this before. They won't vote but they'll leave it to God to decide. This is the kind of non-mentality that got Jimmy Carter elected and Obama a second term.

This is the kind of non-mentality that will hand the election over to that goblin running against Mr. Trump and that creature will be in a better position to wreck the country than her predecessor.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
- Edmund Burke

Tell anyone like that in no uncertain terms that you will NOT discuss politics or socio-economic matters with them if they don't vote.

In November ...

GET OUT AND VOTE.

Not voting is a vote FOR Hillary.

Donald Trump for President here.

Republican Party website here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/e/edmundburk377528.html

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/e/edmundburk377528.

Some Memes, Hillary and Otherwise

Some Memes, Hillary and Otherwise

Found these in various places on the interbutts. Thought I'd share ...

And Billy didn't with "that woman"

Could Hillary be taking a cue from this?

She is SO qualified to be president.

Of course Mitt Romney proves you don't
have to have a  vagina to be a cunt.

A "not vote" is a vote FOR Hillary.

Donald Trump for president here.

Republican Party web site here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.

Khizr Kahns' Cheap Shot

Khizr Kahns' Cheap Shot

Last week, at the invitation of the Dem party, Khizr Kahn, a Sharia scholar/lawyer spoke at the Dem National Convention and attempted to call Donald Trumps' character into question. He made mention of his son killed in action in Iraq in 2004 and declared that Mr. Trump "sacrificed nothing".

Whether this was an attempt at a "moral equivalency" ploy (In regard to Pat Smith.) or a move to bait Mr. Trump remains to be seen. Unfortunately Mr. Trump bit at it and thus a media bruhaha came about. Hopefully Mr. Trump has learned a lesson from this and stays on his theme ("The country is going to hell, I can fix it and Hillary can't.") from now on.

Some thoughts about Mr. Kahn:

1. I can't say for sure what Mr. Kahns' motivation was for, yes, attacking Mr. Trump but I can surmise that it had partly to do with the false belief that Mr. Trump wants to bar all Muslims from immigrating here.

Being the religious bigot and racist bastard that I am, I regret that's NOT the case. Mr. Trump only wants a temporary halt on immigration from the mid-east until a more effective vetting process in weeding out possible radicals and terrorists is in place.

Having been active in the white supremacist movement back in the day, I KNOW that Mr. Trump would have come across as a great disappointment at the hate rallies and paranoia fests I attended.

2. Mr. Khan has stated in the past that Sharia law should supersede the Constitution. It's rather interesting Khan waved that copy of the Constitution for all the world to see and questioned Trumps' knowledge of it. It's a good bet that Mr. Trump knows more about Sharia law than what Khan expresses about the Constitution.

3. Mr. Kahns' figuratively "throwing down" the body of his son at Mr. Trumps' feet I find creepy at best. This is no better than those pathologicals exploiting dead children in the name of "gun control".

Allowing the use of his deceased son for the purpose of Clinton and the Dem party to "dance" on for political gain I find revolting. His sons' duty and sacrifice can never be cheapened. Mr. Kahn has only dishonored himself. Truly, in this case, the son is greater than the father.

4. Pat Smiths' loss came about due to Clintons' and the present administrations' negligence in taking proper measures that could have given a more favorable outcome to the Benghazi fiasco.

Mr. Kahns' loss came about from Bushs' NOT needed invasion of Iraq. Saddam Hussein learned his lesson from Desert Storm and was quite content to oppress those within his borders, weapons of mass destruction (Or the lack of the presence thereof.) notwithstanding. Mr. Trump had actually opposed this invasion.

5. Mr. Trumps' having or not having sacrificed anything is neither here nor there. Any claim to Mr. Kahn having some kind of moral high ground over Mr. Trump rings a bit hollow with me. Except for Mr. Trumps' lame reply to George Stephanopoulos' inquiry, I don't think Mr. Trump ever tried to come across as any kind of suffering saint.

Just sayin' ...


Mr. Khans' interesting past here.

Mr. Khans' claim of Sharia over the Constitution here.

Fun facts about Sharia law here. While I'm not a Zionist or rapture bunny, I find this web site interesting.

An Open Letter to Mr. Khizr Khan here.

Donald Trump for President here.



Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you're already there.

It's Called ... Sarcasm

It's Called ... Sarcasm


Taking and editing a quote from Donald Trumps' latest press conference out of context, the pathologicals at CNN, etc. would have you believe Mr. Trump is inviting foreign powers to hack at our government computer nets and engage in espionage in general.

Here's the exact quote:

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let's see if that happens. That'll be next."

The thirty grand reference is in regard to the e-mails that were deleted off the private server Clinton had when she was Secretary of State. The quote itself is in regard to the recent Wikileaks revelation of the Democrat National Committees' e-mails about the low regard the DNC has for its' constituencies and the backstabbing of Bernie Sanders in assuring Clinton of securing the presidential nomination.

The DNC would have you believe the real issue is about Russia hacking into their system (OH NO! It's a commie plot! The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!) and possible complicity by Donald Trump. After all, didn't El Donaldo just welcome their involvement?

BULLSHIT!

1. Whether the Russkies did it or not is NOT the issue. The REAL issue is the DNCs' utter contempt for their constituencies and the American electorate as a whole as proven by the content of their e-mails.

Any Democrats reading this, keep in mind: You don't matter. What matters to the DNC is to get that haridan in the White House and to hell with what you think.

2. What Mr. Trump said is not a declaration of allegiance to a foreign power. What it is is a snarky aside to the DNCs' fear, paranoia and embarrassment at being found out.

It's called ... SARCASM: A form of exaggeration used to point out the stupidities and/or shortcomings of another. In this case, the DNC.

In short ... It's HUMOR.

My message to the DNC, its' sympathizers and other pathologicals.

Screw you ... Even if you CAN take a joke!

That weird web site where I got the illustrations for this article here.

Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. Any articles under this means you have already arrived.

Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media ... AGAIN

This creature is in the pay of the Saudi and Iran Sharia states.
What else would you expect?

Yeah, I know. I posted this 4chan article a couple times before. In light of the present liberal gun control wankfest, I feel it needs to be read ... AGAIN.


Methodology of the Anti-Gun Media


I am now exposing the methodology of the anti gun media Anonymous 12/22/12(Sat)21:12 No.13862261

Ok, /k/ommandos:

So here's what's going on right now in the US Media: ideological subversion. There is a pattern and a method at work here, and it's a pattern and method we need to educate yourselves about. It's no secret that the mass media (with the exception of Fox News, regardless of your feelings toward that network) is pushing for gun control. The majority of Americans are opposed to gun control, and the Left cannot stand this fact. We are the majority.

So what exactly is the mass media doing and how are they doing it? There's a simple answer to this question. The various news networks and publications are telling Americans what and how to think.

Here is the method they are utilizing:

1. Build an emotional shitstorm through sensationalism and bombarding us with constant reminders of the Sandy Hook Massacre, even though there is plenty of other news.

2. Present the Left's argument for gun control before the Left's politicians do. This gives the appearance of a grassroots movement.

3. Build a false narrative. For example: Evil child-killing assault weapons with glock clips, and shoulder things that go up are finding their way into the hands of murderers with ease, and are triggering gun crimes.

4. Demonize and ridicule the NRA, GOA, Republican Party, Libertarians, and anyone else who opposes gun control. Very Alinskyite.

5. Fake a consensus. Stock panels with antigunners and foreigners who don't understand America's heritage of freedom. If you want a good example of this, take a look at CNN's panel discussion a few nights ago. Three of the panelists had British accents. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIPV4N_81PU )

6. Present gun control as the only solution to the problem of violence.

7. Claim that gun control is "progress" and that the Constitution is outdated and requires revisions.


4chan 12-22-12

NRA website here.

Donald Trump for president here.

Lying Crooked Hillary dot com here.

That weird political site with the anime pics where I got the above illustration here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. You're already there if there are articles beneath.

13 Hours: A Most Accurate Film

"WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!? IT WASN'T MY RESPONSIBILITY!
... VOTE FOR ME! ... GUN CONTROL! ... GUN CONTROL! ... "

13 Hours: A Most Accurate Film


I understand Michael Bays' upcoming film, 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, to be a very accurate depiction of the events up to and including the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya on 9-11-12.

How do I know this? The broad in the picture above doesn't appear in the movie either.

Benghazi was a much nicer place when Rommel, Monty and Graziani were running about.


Wikipedia article on film, 13 Hours here.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here. If ya' sees articles after this, former first harridan or no, then yer already there.

Benghazi: This Graphic Says It ALL

Benghazi: This Graphic Says It ALL


SOMEONE screwed up and someone(s) died for it. That SOMEONE doesn't want to own up to it. Even if that skirt that SOMEONE is hiding behind is a harpy and a harridan it still doesn't hide the fact that SOMEONE is a coward.

As for you Ms. Clinton, I am not impressed. Taking the fall for someone else does not make you noble. It makes you an accessory. To me, it's doubtful you did it without gaining some kind of political benefit from it. There is nothing altruistic about you.

Needless to say, I am not convinced.


Go to Jays' Tee Vee blog main page here.